You are here:

STEM Learning Community: An Interdisciplinary Seminar for First- and Second-year College Science Majors
ARTICLE

, Bethel College

Journal of STEM Education Volume 16, Number 4, ISSN 1557-5284 Publisher: Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Full Text

Abstract

To attract and retain more academically qualified students to science and mathematics, we developed a merit-based scholarship program for incoming students with STEM interests. Scholarship recipients participate for the first two years in an interdisciplinary learning community and declare a STEM major by the sophomore year. STEM Learning Community, a year-long course initiated in fall 2009, has become a permanent part of the College curriculum. Content consists of weekly meetings for discussions and presentations on such topics as scientific ethics, relationships between science and technology, the nature and history of science, and the interplay between scientific discovery and societal development. A major component is a group research project conducted during the school year and presented at our annual undergraduate research symposium. In addition, we provide career counseling, visits and presentations by STEM professionals, and internship opportunities. Students report that they are developing such valuable skills as problem solving ability, communication skills, collaboration, and knowledge of the research process. Enrollment and graduation data show that numbers of participants, especially women and minority students, increased during the first four years. The results suggest that scholarships combined with engagement in collaborative undergraduate research are a useful tool for enhancing STEM recruitment and persistence.

Citation

Piper, J. (2015). STEM Learning Community: An Interdisciplinary Seminar for First- and Second-year College Science Majors. Journal of STEM Education, 16(4),. Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE). Retrieved July 6, 2022 from .

© 2015 Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. ACT (2014). The Condition of STEM 2014, Iowa City: ACT, Inc.
  2. Adedokun, O.A., & Burgess, W.D. (2011). Uncovering students’ preconceptions of undergraduate research experiences. Journal of STEM Education, 12, 12-22.
  3. Aldas, T., Crispo, V., Johnson, N., & Price, T.A. (2010). Learningbydoing: The Wagner Plan from classroom to career. Peer Review, 12, 24-28.
  4. Astin, A.W., & Astin, H.S. (1993). Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences,
  5. Braxton, J.M. (2000). Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  6. Brewer, C., & Smith, D. (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology: A Call to Change, Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  7. Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30-34.
  8. National Research Council (2010). Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills: A Workshop Summary, Washington: National Academies Press.
  9. National Science Board (2004). Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004. NSB 01-01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  10. O’Neill, N. (2010). Internships as a high-impact educational practice: Some reflections on quality. Peer Review, 12, 4-8.
  11. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Passel, J., & Cohn, D. (2008). US Population Projections: 2005-2050, Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
  13. Pierson, M., & Troppe, M. (2010). Curriculum to career. Peer Review, 12, 12-14.
  14. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science,
  15. Shanahan, J.O., Liu, X., Manak, J., Miller, S.M., Tan, J. & Yu,C.W. (2015). Research-informed practice, practiceinformed research: The integral role of undergraduate research in professional disciplines. CUR Quarterly, 35(4), 6-16.
  16. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Curses of Student Attrition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Trask, B.C., & Francom, C.R. (2009). Participation in undergraduate research benefits pre-medical students by developing critical skills. The Advisor, 29, 9-12.
  18. Graham, M.J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341, 1455-1456.
  19. Hunter, A., Laursen, S.L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education , 36-74.
  20. Jackson, S.A. (2003). Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering WorkForce for the United States, Washington: National Academy Press.
  21. Kober, N. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, Washington: National Academy Press.
  22. Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They
  23. Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 297-306.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links