Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ISBN 978-1-880094-33-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
It seems a truism but when people are intrinsically motivated to learn, they not only learn more, they also have a more
positive experience (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Handicapped by a lack of good theoretical framework, designers often
assume that good quality instruction is by itself motivating (Keller, 1983). When motivation is considered, it is often
simply seen as steps that must occur prior to instruction, such as “gaining attention” or “orienting the learners” rather
than as a central element in the instructional design itself. Traditional instructional design is concerned with different
issues from those of motivation. Instructional design focuses on learning, while motivation is concerned with emotional
Keller (1983) attempted bridge this gap between instructional and motivational issues. His theory however
was limited due to the fact that it devoted little attention to other variables (Snelbecker, 1987). Keller's
constructs, nonetheless, provide a good theoretical congruence between Csikszentmihalyi's flow theory and
traditional instructional design. Flow is an optimal psychological state (Csikszentmihalyi 1975; 1982; 1985;
1988; 1990; 1994; 1997) in which people become so intensely involved in an activity that nothing else seems
to matter. The experience is so enjoyable that they will do it for its own sake.
Keller and Csikszentmihalyi emphasize the importance of five design elements: challenge, goal,
concentration, control and feedback. At its most basic, flow theory is simply a description of people enjoying
themselves. The goal of this study was an exploratory adaptation of flow theory for designing instructional
activities. We explored how to use flow theory and its effects on motivation in a classroom setting, which
typically has less than optimal conditions.
Chan, T.S. & Ahern, T.C. (1999). The Importance of Motivation: Integrating Flow Theory into Instructional Design. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 780-782). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/7837/.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982). Learning, flow and happiness. In R. Gross (Eds.), Invitation to LifeLong Learning. Chicago: Follett.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Emergent motivation and the evolution of the self. In M.L. Maehr & C. Ames (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 4, 93-119.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). The Evolving Self: A Psychology for the Third Millennium. New York: Harper Collins.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding Flow: the Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. New York: Harper Collins.
- Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
- Jackson, S.A. & Roberts, G.C. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance. The Sport Psychologist, 6,156-171.
- Jackson, S.A. & Marsh, H.W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,18(1), 17-35.
- Keller, J. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Eds.), Instructional Design Theories and Models (pp.383-434). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Snellbecker, G.E. (1987). Contrasting and complementary approaches to instructional design. In C. Reigeluth (Eds.), Instructional Design Theories and Models (pp.321338).
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.