A Quality Assurance Methodology for Technology-Delivered Education and Training
PROCEEDINGS
John Eklund, Access OnLine Pty Ltd, Australia ; David Lowe, The University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet, in San Antonio, Texas Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Abstract
In a climate of increased deployment of information technologies for the flexible delivery of instruction in both the higher education and private sectors, procedures for ensuring a quality outcome are becoming increasingly important. The use of a developmental process that aims to meet established acceptance criteria for a project, and one which incorporates robust evaluation methodologies to validate approach and expenses is generally a key criterion for successful grant and tender applications in this emerging field. This paper outlines a methodology for quality assurance being delivered at Access OnLine. This methodology is based on a structured framework built on sound design principles, and which incorporates project management, performance against milestones, usability and learning effectiveness adopting a 'whole of project lifecycle' approach to formative evaluation.
Citation
Eklund, J. & Lowe, D. (2000). A Quality Assurance Methodology for Technology-Delivered Education and Training. In Proceedings of WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet 2000 (pp. 162-169). San Antonio, Texas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6355/.
© 2000 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Quinn C, Alem L & Eklund J (1999) A pragmatic evaluation methodology for an assessment of learning effectiveness in instructional systems. In S Brewster, A Cawsey & G Cockton (Eds.)
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References