The Impact of WebBased Assessment and Practice on Students’ Mathematics Learning Attitudes
Article
Diem M. Nguyen, Bowling Green State University, United States ; YiChuan Hsieh, ChingYun University, Taiwan ; G. Donald Allen, Texas A&M University, United States
JCMST Volume 25, Number 3, ISSN 07319258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of webbased assessment and practice on improving middle school students' mathematics learning attitudes. With the use of an experimental design and a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, the study compared and contrasted the attitude achievement of students, who used the webbased assessment and practice (WP) with students, who used the traditional assessment and practice (TP). Across multivariate and factor analyses and the transcripts of interview notes, results of the study indicate that with the opportunities of drilling and practicing on the computer and receiving instant scores and adapted feedback, students had gained interests in doing mathematics, and formed a perception that they became smarter in problemsolving. However, the attitude improvements were quite different across ethnic and gender groups. Within the WP group, while male students gained more confidence than females, females expressed stronger opinions on the fact that instant scores and feedback helped them overcome difficulties in mathematics problem solving. Though some limitations still exist with written explanations and partial credits, in comparison with the traditional assessment, the webbased assessment and practice tool in this study substantially helps students build motivation and elevates the meaning of learning and doing mathematics with the use webbased technology.
Citation
Nguyen, D.M., Hsieh, Y.C. & Allen, G.D. (2006). The Impact of WebBased Assessment and Practice on Students’ Mathematics Learning Attitudes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(3), 251279. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 20, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6277/.
© 2006 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
 Aiken, L. R., & Dreger, R. M. (1961). The effects of attitudes on performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 1924.
 Allen, G. D. (2001). Online calculus: The course and survey results. Computers in the Schools: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 17(1/2), 1730.
 Allen, R. (1998). The web: Interactive and multimedia education. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1618), 17171727.
 Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications, (4th ed), New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
 Bennett, R. E. (2001). How the Internet will help largescale assessment reinvent itself. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(5). Retrieved on February 19, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n5.html
 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
 Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp.1932). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 Chi, M. T. H., Lewis, M. W., Reiman, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Selfexplanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145182.
 Comrey, A. L, & Lee, H. B. (1992). A ﬁ rst course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic ﬁ eldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). FennemaSherman mathematics attitude scales: Instrument designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6(31).
 Fleischman, J. (2001, February). Approaches and strategies for assessment: Projectbased learning using technology. Converge Journal, (pp. 3840).
 Galbraith, P., & Haines, C. (1998). Disentangling the Nexus: Attitudes to mathematics and technology in a computer learning environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 275290.
 Gretes, J. A., & Green, M. (2000). Improving undergraduate learning with computerassisted assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 4656.
 Hart, L. E., & Walker, J. (1993). The role of affect in teaching and learning mathematics. Research ideas for the classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 Kulm, G. (1994). Mathematics assessment: What works in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
 Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (1998). Connected mathematics. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Longman.
 Liang, X., & Creasy, K. (2004). Classroom assessment in webbased instructional environment: Instructors’ experience. Practical Assessment, Research
 Linn, D. (2002). Using electronic assessment to measure student performance: Issue brief. Education policy studies division. Retrieved February 19, 2006, from http://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/ELECTRONICASSESSMENT.pdf
 Merill, P. F., & Hammons, C. (1996). Computers in education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
 Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalization, and criticism of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 6588.
 Morgan, C., & O’Reilly, M. (2001). Innovations in online assessment. In F. Lockwood & A. Gooley (Eds.), Innovation in open and distance learning: Successful development of online and webbased learning (pp.179188). London: Kogan Page.
 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principle standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
 Nguyen, D. M., & Allen, G. D. (2006). Interactive mathematics QuizMaker and the online placement exams. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: AddisonWesley.
 Nguyen, D. M., & Kulm, G. (2005). Using webbased practice to enhance mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Interactive Online Learning (JIOL), 3(3).
 Norusis, M. J. (1986). The SPSS guide to data analysis. Chicago: SPSS Inc. O’Callaghan, B. R. (1998). Computerintensivealgebra and students’ conceptual knowledge of functions. Journal of Research of Mathematics Education, 29(1), 2141.
 Pemberton, M. R. (1996). The impact of Maple on science and engineering students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second Biennial Australian Engineering Mathematics Conference, (pp. 511519).
 Phipps, R. A. (2004). How does technology affect access in postsecondary education: What do we really know? (NPEC 2004831) Report of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on AccessTechnology. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004831.pdf
 Reif, F. (1987). Interpretation of scientiﬁ c or mathematical concepts: Cognitive issues and instrumental implications. Cognitive Science, 11, 395416. Russell, M. (1999). Testing writing on computers: A followup study comparing performance on computer and on paper. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 7(20). Retrieved February 19, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n20/
 Russell, M., & Haney, W. (1997). Testing writing on computers: An experiment comparing student performance on tests conducted via computer and via paperandpencil. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 5(1). Retrieved on May 20, 2003 from: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v5n3
 Sanchis, G. R. (2001). Using webforms for online assessment. Mathematics and Computer Education, 35(2), 105113.
 Steele, D. F., & Arth, A. A. (1998). Math instruction and assessment: Preventing anxiety, promoting conﬁ dence. Schools in the Middle, 7(3), 4448. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology (Vols. 1 and 2). New York: Columbia University.
 Webbased Education Commission (WBEC). (2001). Retrieved on February 25, 2002 from: http://www.hpcnet.org/webcommission
 Zandvliet, D., & Farragher, P. (1997). A comparison of computeradministered and written test. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 29(4), 423438.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.
Cited By

Webbased Education and Accessibility
Emre Dinc
International Journal of Technology in Education and Science Vol. 1, No. 1 (2017) pp. 29–35

Increasing College Students' Engagement and Success Rates in Developmental Mathematics with WebBased Technologies
Mario Toussaint & Victoria Brown, Florida Atlantic University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2016 (Jun 28, 2016) pp. 658–664
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.