You are here:

Course Management Systems as Tools for the Creation of Online Learning Environments:Evaluation from a Social Constructivist Perspective and Implications for their Design Article

, University of Thessaly, Greece

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 5, Number 4, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

The Internet and the Web offer academic institutions solutions for covering the massive demand for education and transition towards student-centered, social constructivist educational models, in accordance with the demands of the knowledge-based society. This article reports on an investigation aimed at presenting a synthesis of recent research on the applications of Course Management Systems (CMS) in academic institutions, and evaluating the research directions and findings from a social constructivist perspective. The investigation explored current uses of CMS in academia, the impact of CMS on the educational processes, faculty and students, the differences among various modes of CMS-based online learning, and the extent to which CMS support social constructivist approaches to learning. It was found that CMS are currently used in a variety of disciplines for oncampus, mixed-mode, and complete online courses, yielding positive student attitudes and enabling faculty to create online learning environments of social constructivist inspiration. However, creating such environments by means of CMS still poses significant workload on faculty for structuring online interactions, and monitoring and supporting students. Furthermore, the facilities currently offered by CMS still refrain from effectively supporting alternative forms of assessment and collaborative knowledge building activities. Implications for the design of CMS are considered.

Citation

Papastergiou, M. (2006). Course Management Systems as Tools for the Creation of Online Learning Environments:Evaluation from a Social Constructivist Perspective and Implications for their Design. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 593-622. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Angelo, T. (2000). Transforming departments into productive learning communities. In A. Lucas (Ed.), Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs (pp. 74-89). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  2. Bennett, J., & Bennett, L. (2003). A review of factors that influence the diffusion of innovation when structuring a faculty training program. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 53-63. Bostock, S. (1998). Constructivism in mass higher education: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 225-240.
  3. Chiang, G. (2002). What kind of support do they need? An instructional designer's experience in faculty and student support for online courses. Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services (pp. 17-21). New York: ACM Press.
  4. Dede, C. (1996). Distance learning to distributed learning: Making the transition. Learning & Leading with Technology, 23(7), 25-30.
  5. Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source Course Management System. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003,1, 171-178.
  6. Duderstadt, J. (1998). Transforming the university to serve the digital age. CAUSE/EFFECT, 20(4), 21-32. Edutools (2003). Providing decision-making tools for the EDU community. Retrieved May 7, 2006, from http://www.edutools.info/
  7. Fetherston, T. (2001). Pedagogical challenges for the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Review, 9(1), 25-32.
  8. Firdyiwek, Y. (1999). Web-based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy?. Educational Technology, 39(1), 29-34.
  9. Gros, B. (2002). Knowledge construction and technology. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(4), 323-343.
  10. Harasim, L. (1999). A framework for online learning: The Virtual-U. IEEE Computer, 32(9), 44-49. Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41-61.
  11. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1997). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Hayes, R. (2000). Exploring discount usability methods to assess the suitability of online course delivery products. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), 119-134.
  13. Hazari, S. (1998). Evaluation and selection of Web course management tools. Retrieved May 7, 2006, from http://www.sunilhazari.com/education/webct
  14. Heeler, P., & Hardy, C. (2002). Implementing a web-based master's degree in instructional technology: A progress report. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(4), 72-76. Heinecke, W., Dawson, K., & Willis, J. (2001). Paradigms and frames for R&D in distance education: Toward collaborative electronic learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 293-322. Papastergiou
  15. Kandzia, P. (2003). Online courses step by step. In Klein, R., Six, H-W., Wenger, L. (Eds.), Computer science in perspective (pp. 206-215). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  16. Kurtz, B., Parks, D., & Nicholson, E. (2002). Effective Internet education: A progress report. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 312-316). New York: ACM Press.
  17. Linge, R. (2003). The good, the bad, and the ridiculous: Putting a course online with Blackboard. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18(4), 355-364.
  18. McCormack, C., & Jones, D. (1998). Building a web-based education system. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Morss, D. (1999). A study of student perspectives on web-based learning: WebCT in the classroom. Electronic Networking, 9(5), 393-408.
  20. Oliver, K. (2000). Methods for developing constructivist learning on the web. Educational Technology, 40(6), 5-18.
  21. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2000). Web-based learning and generic skills development. UniServe Science News, 15. Retrieved May 7, 2006, from http://science.uniserve.edu.au/newslettervol15/oliver.html
  22. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Reeves, T., Baxter, P., & Jordan, C. (2002). Teaching computing courses - computer literacy, business microcomputer applications, and introduction to programming online utilizing WebCT. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(1), 290-300.
  24. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
  25. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Student communities for the advancement of knowledge. Communications of the ACM, 39(1), 36-37.
  26. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.) (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Reaching Out to Remote Places: A Discussion of Technology and The Future of Distance Education in Rural America

    Xi Chen & Andrew Koricich, Texas Tech University, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (Oct 27, 2014) pp. 370–376

  2. Comparison of Face-To-Face and Hybrid Delivery of a Course that Requires Technology Skills Development

    Gary J. Senn, University of South Carolina Aiken, United States

    Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Vol. 7 (Jan 01, 2008) pp. 267–283

  3. Addressing diverse learner preferences and intelligences with emerging technologies: Matching models to online opportunities

    Ke Zhang, Wayne State University; Curtis J. Bonk, Indiana University

    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 34, No. 2 (Mar 25, 2009)

  4. Evaluating the Motivational Aspects of a Web-based Learning Environment for the Teaching of Middle School Geometry

    Emmanouil Choustoulakis & Emmanouil Nikoloudakis, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

    Global Learn 2011 (Mar 28, 2011) pp. 803–808

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.