You are here:

Quality Assurance – Best Practices for Assessing Online Programs
Article

, Gallaudet University, United States

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 5, Number 2, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Educators have long sought to define quality in education. With the proliferation of distance education and online learning powered by the Internet, the tasks required to assess the quality of online programs become even more challenging. To assist educators and institutions in search of quality assurance methods to continuously improve their distance education programs, the Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) published Elements of Quality: The Sloan-C Framework (Moore, 2002), outlining five pillars of quality – learning effectiveness, access, student satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, and cost effectiveness for online programs. Based on a relevant literature review, this article explores the reasons behind the push for online program quality assurance, key benchmarks recommended by major accreditation agencies and some best practices currently utilized to ensure online program quality standard. It serves as a starting point for distance education administrators and educators to formulate program goals and assessment policies regarding their online programs.

Citation

Wang, Q. (2006). Quality Assurance – Best Practices for Assessing Online Programs. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 265-274. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Staying Connected: The Cycle of Innovation

    Isabel Breen & Jessica Fuda Daddio, Keiser University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 240–245

  2. Perceptions of Roles and Responsibilities in Online Learning: A Case Study

    Annemieke Craig, Annegret Goold, Jo Coldwell & Jamie Mustard, Deakin University, Australia

    Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 4, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2008) pp. 205–223

  3. Online Teacher Education Course Redesign: From Stand-Alone Activities to Content Area Design Teams

    Kathryn Lee, Beth Bos & Karyn Turnbull, Texas State University-San Marcos, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 443–448

  4. Effects of an E-Learning Support Help Desk on the Implementation of E-Learning Technologies by University Faculty

    Chris Andrews, Brigham Young University-Idaho, United States; Shane Moulton, Idaho State University, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (Oct 26, 2009) pp. 3429–3434

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.