You are here:

Making Meaning through the Viewfinder: Responding to Literature through Video
PROCEEDINGS

, , Purdue University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a qualitative study exploring the use of video and video production as a response to literature. As part of the English Literature Arts curriculum at a high school in the Midwestern United States, students independently read a book of their choosing in order to complete a character analysis. Rather than assigning the traditional written analysis, the teacher required students to demonstrate their understanding of the main character in their chosen book through the creation of a video analysis. In this paper, the authors examine the need for authentic integration of technology in secondary ELA, the difficulties of developing technology-rich curriculum, the potential for technology to engage students in new methods of literature response while addressing the new ELA Common Core Standards, and the implications of preparing secondary English teachers to address these elements in their future curriculum.

Citation

Boche, B. & Shoffner, M. (2013). Making Meaning through the Viewfinder: Responding to Literature through Video. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4472-4478). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 21, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Arver, C.M. (2007). Are you willing to have your students join Ralph, Jack, and Piggy? English Journal, 97(1), 37–42.
  2. Bailey, N. (2009). “It makes it more real.” Teaching new literacies in a secondary English classroom. English Education, 41(3), 207-235.
  3. Cervatti, G., Damico, J., & Pearson, P.D. (2006). Multiple literacies, new literacies, and teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 378-386.
  4. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  5. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  6. Day, J. (2010). Of mice and media. English Journal, 100(1), 70–75.
  7. Flanagan, S., & Shoffner, M. (2011). Two teachers’ technology use: Recommendations for English teacher preparation. In C. Maddux et al. (Ed.), Research highlights in information technology and teacher education 2011 (pp. 199–208). Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology and Teacher
  8. Gainer, J.S., & Lapp, D. (2010). Remixing old and new literacies= motivated students. English Journal, 100(1), 58–64.
  9. George, M. (2011): Preparing Teachers to Teach Adolescent Literature in the 21st Century, Theory Into Practice, 50:3, 182-189
  10. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241-267.
  11. McPhearson, S., Wang, S., Hsu, H., & Tsuei, M. (2007). New literacies instruction in teacher education. TechTrends, 51(5), 24-31.
  12. Medicus, D., & Wood, S.N. (2000). The power of technology to inspire students and teachers in English language arts classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online], 1(2), 236– 243.
  13. NCTE. (2005). NCTE position statement on multimodal literacies. Retrieved from-4477-http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/multimodalliteracies. NCTE. (2008). The NCTE definition of 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition.
  14. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  15. Sewell, W., & Denton, S. (2011). Multimodal literacies in the secondary classroom. English Journal, 100(5), 61-65.
  16. Shoffner, M., De Oliveira, L., & Angus, R. (2010). Multiliteracies in the secondary English classroom: Becoming literate in the 21st century. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 9(3), 75–89.
  17. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers and Education, 44: 343-355.
  18. Sternberg, B.J., Kaplan, K.A., & Borck, J.E. (2007). Enhancing adolescent literacy achievement through integration of technology in the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 416-420.
  19. Swenson, J., Rozema, R., Young, C.A., McGrail, E., & Whitin, P. (2006). Extending the conversation: New technologies, new literacies, and English education. English Education, 38(4), 351-369.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.