You are here:

Pre-service teachers´ perceptions on educational networking: an exploratory study
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Minho - Braga - Portugal, Portugal

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The motivation to carry out the learning experience presented in this paper derived from three premises found in the review of literature that sustains the empirical sudy: i) social networking is a daily routine for most western world citizens; ii) (portuguese) non superior schools are equipped with computers and Internet access; iii) the integration of the technologies in the curriculum is related to the ICT training teachers have in their initial education programs. Taking these assumptions as a guide, social networking activities were integrated in an ICT program at a Portuguese university enrolling 26 pre-service teachers from humanities (History, Geography and Philosophy). For one semester student teachers used PROEDI (www.proedi.ning.com) a social networking created to be an informal space for professional growth Portuguese speaking teachers. For data collection we used observation of the interactions (sociometric analysis) as well as two online questionnaires (initial and final) to evaluate students´ perceptions on educational networking. Results are presented and discussed.

Citation

Coutinho, C. & Lisboa, E. (2013). Pre-service teachers´ perceptions on educational networking: an exploratory study. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3482-3492). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alves, M. (2008). O Computador e a Internet como instrumentos pedagó gicos: estudo explorat ó rio com professores do 2º e 3º ciclo do ensino básico e do ensino secundário de escolas do concelho de Vila Verde. Master Thesis. Braga, Portugal: Universidade do Minho
  2. Bardin, L. (2011). Content Analysis. (4ª ed.). Lisboa: Edi ç õ es 70.
  3. Borgatti, S.P. (2002). Netdraw Network Visualization. Analytic Technologies: Harvard, MA. Cachapuz, A., Sá-Chaves, I. & Paixã o, F. (2004). Relat ó rio do Estudo Saberes Básicos de todos os Cidadã os no Século XXI. In Saberes Básicos de todos os Cidadã os no Século XXI (1594). Lisboa: Ministério da Educa ç ã o-Instituto de Inovaç ã oEducacional. Coutinho, C. (2009b). Tecnologias Web 2.0 na sala de aula: três propostas de futuros professores de Português. In Educa ç ã o, Forma ç ã o e Tecnologia, Vol. 2 (1), pp. 75-86,
  4. Coutinho, C.P. (2012). Developing Pre-Service Teachers´ Competencies In Using Technologies In The Classroom: An Example From Portugal. In C.D. Maddux, & D. Gibson (eds.). Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2012. (pp. 91101).
  5. Davis, F.D. (1989). “ Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), pp. 318-340.
  6. Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. JRTE, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 255– 284.
  7. Fernandes, R.C.M. (2006). Atitudes dos Professores Face à s TIC e a sua utilizaç ã o ao ní vel do ensino secundário. Tese de Mestrado. Lisboa: Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educa ç ã o, Universidade de Lisboa.
  8. Hargadon, S. (2008). Educational Networking: The important role Web 2.0 will play in education. Retrieved from http://audio.edtechlive.com/lc/EducationalSocialNetworkingWhitepaper.pdf: Elluminate.
  9. Hirschi, C. (2010). Introduction: Applications of Social Network Analysis. 6th Conference on Applications of Social Network Analysis (pp.2-3) Manchester: Procedia Social and
  10. Kershner, R., Pedder, D. & Doddington, C. (2013). Professional learning during a schoolsuniversity partnership Master of Education course: Teachers perspectives of their learning experiences. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, Volume 19, 1, pp. 33-49.
  11. Lambert, J. & Gong Y. (2010): 21st Century Paradigms for Pre-Service Teacher Technology Preparation, Computers in the Schools, 27:1, 54-70.
  12. Marcelo, C. (2009). Desenvolvimento Profissional Docente: Passado e Futuro. SIFISO / Revista de Ciências da Educa ç ã o N.º 8 jan/abr, 7-22.
  13. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. 9 (5), 1-6. Retrieved from:// www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf Rocha, A. Mota, P. & Coutinho, C. (2011). TPACK: Challenges for Teacher Education in the 21st Century. In A. Flores et al. (orgs.). Proceedings of the 15th Biennial of the International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching (ISATT), Back to the Future: Legacies, Continuities and Changes in Educational Policy, Practice and Research, Braga, University of Minho. (pp. 37-44). ISBN: 978-989-8525-00-0.
  14. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  15. Sadaf, A., Newby, T.J., & Ertmer, P.A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171-195.
  16. Selwyn, N. (2013). Education in a Digital World: Global Perspectives on Technology and Education. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  17. Shafer, K. (2008). Learning to teach with technology through an apprenticeship model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(1), 27 – 44.
  18. UNESCO (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156209E.pdf Vannatta, R.A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253– 271.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.