You are here:

Building Creativity through Constructive Pedagogy in an Online Teacher Preparation Course
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , University of Northern Colorado, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

This study investigated teacher candidates’ self-perceptions of creativity through constructive pedagogical practices of instructors in an online teacher preparation course. This research used mixed methods that provide authentic evidence of the perceptions of teacher candidates about creativity and pedagogical practices that promote creativity. Findings reveal the complexities of perceptions about creativity as it relates to thinking and practice. Pedagogy that promoted dynamic personal engagement and hands-on or active participation was perceived as creative.

Citation

Williams, M.K., Diteeyont, W., Genet, D. & Wang, X. (2013). Building Creativity through Constructive Pedagogy in an Online Teacher Preparation Course. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1137-1142). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 8, 2020 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bogdan, R. & Beklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. (Cheng, Y.C. (2005). Development of multiple thinking and creativity in organizational learning. The International Journal of Educational Management, 19(6/7), 605-622.
  2. Gayton, J. (2009). Analyzing online education through the lens of institutional theory and practice: The need for research based and validated framework for planning, designing, delivering, and assessing online instruction. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 51(2), 62-75.
  3. Faulk, N. (2010). Online teacher education– what are the results? Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(11), 21-28.
  4. Faulk, N.T. (2011). Perceptions of Texas public school superintendents regarding online teacher education. Journal of College Teaching& Learning, 8(5), 25–30.
  5. King, K. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 231-246).
  6. Lubart, T.I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3), 295-308.
  7. Massialas, B.G., & Zevin, J. (1983). Teaching creatively: Learning through discovery. Malaba, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Inc.
  8. Mayerhoff, M.K. (2008). Convergent versus divergent thinking. Perspectives on Parenting, 24(12), 8-9.
  9. Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1(3), 166-169.
  10. Smith, R.D. (2009). Virtual Voices: Online Teachers’ Perceptions of Online Teaching Standards. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 17(4), 547-571.
  11. Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The natural of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.
  12. Urban, K.K. (2007). Assessing in creativity: A componential Model. In Tan, A-G. (Ed). Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 167-184). Toh Tuck Link: Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.(cid:1)

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections