You are here:

Evaluating and Improving Face to Face Professional Development for Online Faculty
PROCEEDINGS

, , Center for Faculty Excellence, Walden University, United States

Global Learn, in Online, Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

This paper describes the program evaluation and iterative improvement process used to support increased effectiveness of one component of our institution’s professional development program for online faculty. We conducted ongoing observation across four sessions of face-to-face faculty meetings, with implementation of improvements made at each session. Goals were to identify needed changes to the faculty meeting via faculty member input and respond to faculty input through implementation of relevant improvements. Both the program evaluation approach used and the outcomes may provide helpful insight for other institutions in approaching faculty development planning.

Citation

Bissell, S. & Bonura, K. (2012). Evaluating and Improving Face to Face Professional Development for Online Faculty. In Proceedings of Global Learn 2012: Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 104-108). Online,: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bell, A., Morris, G. (2009). Engaging Professional Learning in Online Environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Psychology, 25 (5), 700 – 713.
  2. Clay, M. (1999). Development of Training and Support Programs for Distance Education Instructors. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, II (3), retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall23/clay23.html.
  3. Eib, B.J., Miller, P. (2006). Faculty Development as Community Building. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7 (2).
  4. Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., Worthen, B.R. (2004). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 3rd Edition. Boston: Pearson.
  5. Greer, E. (2002). Faculty Development Models in Distributed Learning. Distance Learning, 2002: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (18th, Madison, Wisconsin, August 14 – 16, 2001): 129 – 132.
  6. Lackey, K. (2011). Faculty Development: An Analysis of Current and Effective Training Strategies for Preparing Faculty to Teach Online. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XIV, (5), retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter144/lackey144.html.
  7. Puzziferro, M., Shelton, K. (2009). Supporting Online Faculty– Revisiting the Seven Principles (A Few Years Later). Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XII (3),retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall123/puzziferro123.html.
  8. Riedinger, B., Rosenberg, P. (2006). Technology and Pedagogy: The Evolution of an Online Teaching Certification Course. Educause Quarterly, 1: 32 – 39.
  9. Roman, T., Kelsey, K., Lin, H. (2010). Enhancing Online Education through Instructor Skill Development in Higher Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XIII (4), retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter134/roman_kelsey134.html.
  10. Tipple, R. (2010). Effective Leadership of Online Adjunct Faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XIII (1), retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring131/tipple131.html.
  11. Velez, A. (2009). The Ties that Bind: How Faculty Learning Communities Connect Online Adjuncts to their Virtual Institutions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XII (2), retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer122/velez122.html.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides