You are here:

Social Conformity in Online Environments: A Comparison Between Text and Video PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , , , , Indiana Wesleyan University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Montréal, Quebec, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-98-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Social conformity is defined as movement from one’s own position to a contradictory position based on the expressed positions of others in a group (Cialdini & Trost, 1998). Asch (1955) discovered that roughly one-third of participants went against their judgment to agree with an incorrect response of confederates in their group. Additional studies since then have elucidated the factors associated with conformity in the physical world; however, research on social conformity in online environments is still evolving. Using Google+ Hangout, this experimental study examined social conformity in both synchronous textual and video online environments. Although no statistical difference was found between the two groups, participants in both conditions conformed. Interestingly, participants were equally likely to conform in the text condition as in the video condition. This project adds to the general literature on conformity, as well as direction for future research.

Citation

Devers, C., Steenbergh, T., Devers, E., Brighton, R., Ayers, B., Carmichael, E., Keen, J. & Hannum, P. (2012). Social Conformity in Online Environments: A Comparison Between Text and Video. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2012--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 1 (pp. 1777-1781). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Asch, S.E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31-35.
  2. Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I.A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General And Applied, 70(9), 1-70.
  3. Bond, R., & Smith P.B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111-137.
  4. Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance. In S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151-168). New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Connell, J.B., Mendelsohn, G.A., Robins, R.W., & Canny, J. (2001). Effects of communication medium on interpersonal perceptions: Don’t hang upon the telephone yet! In Proceedings of GROUP 2001 (pp. 117-124).
  6. Darley, J. (1966). Fear and social comparison as determinants of conformity behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(1), 73-78.
  7. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629-636.
  8. Devers, C.J. (2011). Developing trust and openness in an online environment. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(5), 17-28.
  9. Laporte, L., van Nimwegen, C., & Uyttendaele, A.J. (2010). Do people say what they think: Social conformity behavior in varying degrees of online social pressure? In Proceedings: NordiCHI 2010 (pp. 305-315).
  10. McKenna, K.A., & Green, A.S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, And Practice, 6(1), 116127.
  11. Merryfield, M. (2003). Like a veil: Cross-cultural experiential learning online. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(2), 146-171.
  12. Pendry, L., & Carrick, R. (2001). Doing what the mob do: Priming effects on conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 83-92.
  13. Rosander, M., & Eriksson, O. (2012). Conformity on the Internet– The role of task difficulty and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1587–1595.
  14. Stacey, E. (2002). Social presence online: network learners at a distance. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 287294.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.