You are here:

Instructional Design in Higher Education: Unifying Expectations and Responsibilities
PROCEEDINGS

, University of North Dakota, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Montréal, Quebec, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-98-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

In their formal education programs, instructional designers are taught strategies for designing instruction and have come to understand their role in this multi-person process. When new instructional designers become employed at higher education institutions, the expected role and the position description differ. This brief paper discusses the intended role of instructional designers, the practical responsibilities they take on in higher education, and how to unify the two through the development of certain skill sets, enabling a smooth transition for instructional designers into their careers in academia. The implications rely on research in the field supplemented by the author’s professional experience as an instructional designer in a higher education institution.

Citation

Salentiny, A. (2012). Instructional Design in Higher Education: Unifying Expectations and Responsibilities. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2012--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 1 (pp. 1567-1573). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allen, M. (1996). A profile of instructional designers in Australia. Distance Education, 17(1), 7-32.
  2. Bird, J. (2004). Professional naval gazing: Flexible learning professionals into the future. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas DASHDASH
  3. Campbell, K, Schwier, R., & Kenny, R. (2009). The critical, relational practice of instructional design in higher education: An emerging model of change agency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 645-663.
  4. Carliner, S. & Driscoll, M. (2009). Who ’ s creating the e-learning? Paradigms for content creation that exclude the instructional designer. In M. Allen (ed.). Michael Allen’s 2009 e-Learning Annual, 43-56. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  5. Cox, S. & Osguthorpe, R. (2003). How do instructional design professionals spend their time? TechTrends, 47(3), 29 & 45-47.
  6. Fyle, C., Moseley, A., Hayes, N. (2012) Troubled times: The role of instructional design in a modern dual-mode university? Open Learning, 27(1), 53-64.
  7. Gagne, R., Wager, W., Golas, K., Keller, J. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  8. Holsbrink-Engels, G. (1997). Computer-based role-playing for interpersonal skills training. Simulation and Gaming, 28(2), 164181.
  9. Kenny, R., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R., & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/147/
  10. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research& Development, 41(3), 4-16.
  11. Liu, M., Gibby, S., Quiros, O., & Demps, E. (2002). Challenges of being an instructional designer for new media development: A view from the practitioners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 195-219.
  12. Macpherson, C., & Smith, A. (1998). Academic authors’ perceptions of the instructional design and development process for distance education: A case study. Distance Education, 19(1), 124-141.
  13. McGriff, S. (2001). Leadership in higher education: Instructional designers in faculty development programs. Paper presented at
  14. Pan, C. & Thompson, K. (2009). Exploring dynamics between instructional designers and higher education faculty: An ethnographic case study. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 33-52.
  15. Quinn, J. (1994). Connecting education and practice in an instructional design graduate program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 71-82.
  16. Rothwell, W. & Kazanas, H. (2008). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  17. Salentiny, A. (2010). Five misconceptions about instructional designers in higher education and ways we can dispel them. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Association for Educational Communications and Technology Convention, October 26-30, Anaheim, CA.
  18. Sims, R. & Koszalka, T. (2008). Competencies for the new-age instructional designer. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Van
  19. Steplch, D., Ertmer, P., Lane, M. (2001). Problem-solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 53-69.
  20. Su, B., Binder, M., Sundholm, T. & Rivas, F. (2011). A hospital and university collaboration: An e-learning solution. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011, 430-435.
  21. Tichenor, S. (2001). Cutting edge technology: Inspiration or irritation? Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development. May 20, Austin, TX.
  22. Truman-Davis, T., Futch, L., Thompson, K., & Yonekura, F. (2000). Support for online teaching and learning: The University of Central Florida keeps faculty ahead of the curve with a creative development program. Educause Quarterly, 2(1), 44-51.
  23. Yusop, F., & Correia, A. (2012). The civic-minded instructional designers framework: An alternative approach to contemporary instructional designers’ education in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 180-190.
  24. Wakefield, J., Warren, S. & Mills, L. (2012). Traits, skills, & Competencies aligned with workplace demands: What today's instructional designers need to master. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012, 3126-3132. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  25. Wedmen, J. & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers’ decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43-57.
  26. West, C., Farmer, J., & Wolff, P. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.