You are here:

Incorporating Social Oriented Agent and Interactive Simulation in E-learning: Impact on Learning, Perceptions, Experiences to non-Native English Students PROCEEDINGS

, , Sirt University, Libya

AACE Award

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Montréal, Quebec, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-98-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

There is an unrealized potential in the use of socially-oriented pedagogical agent and interactive simulation in e-learning system. In this paper, we investigate the impact of having a socially oriented tutor agent and the incorporation of interactive simulation in e-learning into student performances, perceptions and experiences for non-native English speakers students of computer science. Quasi-experimental results indicate that there is an increase on students performance in an agent plus interactive simulations while the perceptions on agent’s ability to interact and communicate varies significantly. Qualitative results reveal that the use of interactive simulations and social agent is memorable, deepen learning but provide informal communication, dissatisfaction and limited.

Citation

Ballera, M. & Elssaedi, M.M. (2012). Incorporating Social Oriented Agent and Interactive Simulation in E-learning: Impact on Learning, Perceptions, Experiences to non-Native English Students. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2012--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 1 (pp. 495-503). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 22, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aragon, S. (2003). Creating social presence in online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 57–68.
  2. Ballera, M., Omar, A. (2012). Exploring Social Networking Technology and Multiple Pedagogical Agents: How, When and to What Extent they Facilitate Learning in E-Learning System. To be Appeared in the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE 2012). Rhodes Island, Greece.
  3. Ballera, M., Musa, A. (2011). Personlize eLearning System using Three Parameters and Genetic Algorithms– Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference,-March 7, 2011 (pp 569-574) Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  4. Brookfield, S.D. (1986) Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 1-55542355-8.
  5. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., & Yerasimou, T. (2008). Conversational agents and their longitudinal affordances on communication and interaction. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 251–270.
  6. Fulton, K. (2001) WBEC The Power of the Internet for Learning. Report of the Web-Based Education Commission to the President and Congress of the United States. Retrieved on http://www.techknowlogia.org/TKL_Articles/PDF/277.pdf
  7. Gulz, A. (2004). Benefits of virtual characters in computer based learning environments: Claims and evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 313–334.
  8. Kim, Y., & Baylor, A.L. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(03), 223-243.
  9. Miller, C., Veletsianos, G., & Doering, A. (2009). EnALI: A research and design framework for virtual characters and pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(2), 171–194.
  10. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.C. (2001) The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents. Cognition and Instruction, V. 19, pp 177-213.
  11. Morton, H., Jack, M.A. (2005). Scenario-based spoken interaction with virtual agents. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, V. 18 pp. 171-191.
  12. Reategui, E., Polonia, E., Roland. (2007). The role of animated pedagogical agents in scenario-based language elearning: a case study. International Conference on Computer Aided Learning (ICL 2007). September 26-28, Villach, Austria.
  13. Veletsianos, G., Gulz, A., Haake, M., Sjoden, B. (2011). Building a Social Conversational Pedagogical Agent: Design Challenges and Methodological approaches. Conversational Agents and Natural language Interaction: Techniques and Effective Practice (pp. 128-155). IGI Global.
  14. Yurcik, W., Chesnever. C., Cobo, M. (2003). Using Theoretical Computer Simulators for Formal Languages and Automata Theory. Retrived in http://cs.uns.edu.ar/~cic/2003/2003_sigcse.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.