You are here:

The Effects of Annotations of Illustrations and Simplified Text on College Students’ Reading Comprehension in the Web-based Learning Environment
PROCEEDINGS

, , Da-Yeh University, Taiwan

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Denver, Colorado, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-95-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of different annotation modes in web-based learning environment. Participants were assigned into four groups. A multiple-choice reading comprehension test, a recall protocol test, a questionnaire, and an interview were adopted in this study. Participants’ performance on the multiple-choice reading comprehension was better while reading with text-picture combination annotations in the web-based learning environment. Participants’ performance on the recall protocol test was better while reading with text-picture combination annotations in the web-based learning environment. The pedagogical implications for multimedia design were also discussed.

Citation

Yen, Y.C. & Ni, S. (2012). The Effects of Annotations of Illustrations and Simplified Text on College Students’ Reading Comprehension in the Web-based Learning Environment. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2671-2680). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 25, 2020 from .

© 2012 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abraham, L.B. (2001). The effects of multimedia on second language vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Doctorial dissertation. University of New Mexico.
  2. Campbell, N. (1987). Adapted literary texts and the EFL reading comprehension. ELT Journal, 41, 132-135.
  3. Carrell, P.L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33(2), 183-207.
  4. Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183-198.
  5. Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environment. Language Learning& Technology, 1(1), 1-35.
  6. Dale, E., & Chall, J.S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin,
  7. Davis J.N. (1989) Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Reading, 73, 41–52.
  8. Davis, J.N., & Lyman-Hager, M. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 58-72
  9. Duquette, L., Renie, D, & Laurier, M. (1998). The evaluation of vocabulary acquisition when learning French as a second language in a multimedia environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(1), 3-34.
  10. Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, 16, 409-441.
  11. Fry, E.B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading. 11, 513-516.
  12. Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central Topics. New York: Metheun.
  13. Goodman, K.S. (1975). “The reading process”. In London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. The selected writings of Kenneth Goodman.
  14. Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 3, 375-396.
  15. Honeyfield, J. (1977), Word frequency and the importance of context in vocabulary learning, RELC Journal, 8(2), 35-42
  16. Hu, Y.N.(2003). The effects of original text vs simplified text the adventures of Tom Sawyer on reading attitudes and reading comprehension of EFL senior high students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan Jacobs, G.. M. (1994). What lurks in the margin: Use of vocabulary glosses as a strategy in second language reading. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 4 (1), 115-137.
  17. Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 503-516.
  18. Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.
  19. Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  20. Leow, R.P. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (3), 337-55.
  21. Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
  22. Lotherington-Woloszyn, H. (1993). Do simplified texts simplify language comprehension for EFL learner? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED371583)
  23. Lucas, M.A. (1991). Systematic grammatical simplification. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(3), 241-248.
  24. Martinez-Lage, A. (1997) Hypermedia technology for teaching reading. In Bush, M.D. & Terry, R.M.
  25. Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
  26. Moore, P.J., & Scevak, J.J. (1997). Learning from texts and visual aids: a developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(3), 205-223.
  27. Mountford, A. (1976). The notion of simplification: its relevance to materials preparation for English and technology. In J.C. Richards (ED), English for Science and Technology (pp.143-162).
  28. Omaggio, A.C. (1979). Pictures and second language comprehension: do they help? Foreign Language Annuals, 12(2), 107-116.
  29. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Pak, J. (1986). The effects of vocabulary glossing on ESL reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
  31. Roby, W.B. (1999). What’s in a gloss? Language Learning& Technology, 2(2): 94-101. Retrieved from the WorldWide Web July 20, 2006: http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/roby/index.html
  32. Spache, G.S. (1974). Good reading for poor readers. Champaign, IL: Garrard.
  33. Stemler L.K. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: a literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3-4), 339-359.
  34. Wang, M.C. (2003). A case study of multimedia in TEFL. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan
  35. Wu, J.C. (2002). The effects of multimedia annotations on second language vocabulary retention. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University, Taiwan.
  36. Yano, Y., Long, H.M. & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189-219.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections