You are here:

Co-teaching An Online Action Research Class
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Colorado - Denver, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Denver, Colorado, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-95-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

We report our experience co-teaching an action research (AR) required as part of an e-learning master’s degree. Adopting a practice-centered stance we focus on the course activities of participants, with particular attention to the careful crafting of course elements with the goal of achieving an excellent learning experience.

Citation

Wilson, B. & Linder-VanBerschot, J. (2012). Co-teaching An Online Action Research Class. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 7-18). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 8, 2019 from .

© 2012 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adams, B. (2011, April). Maintaining quality of instruction while transitioning from face-to-face to online training. Retrieved from: http://brentadams.weebly.com/uploads/3/6/2/6/3626763/brentadams_action _inquiry_project_041511.docx
  2. Ajjan, H., and Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.
  3. Belawati, T., and Zuhairi, A. (2007). The practice of a quality assurance system in open and distance learning: A case study at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia (The Indonesia Open University). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/340/774 Bender, D.M., Wood, B.J., and Vredevoogd, J.D. (2004). Teaching time: Distance education versus
  4. Boettcher, J.V., and Conrad, R.M. (2010). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  5. Bourdeiu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (trans. Richard Nice). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
  6. Bozarth, J., Chapman, D.D., and LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for distance learning: Designing an online student orientation course. Educational Technology and Society, 7(1), 87-106.
  7. Brown, A.R., and Voltz (2005). Elements of effective e-learning design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/217/300 Casey, G., and Evans, T. (2011). Designing for learning: Online social networks as a classroom
  8. DeNio, D. (2011, May). Lyme disease: A hidden epidemic. Investigating the impact of social media on patient education. Retrieved from: http://dawndenioportfolio.weebly.com/uploads/2/1/8/3/2183383/lymedisease_actionresearchproject.do C
  9. Duffy, D.K., & Jones, J.W. (1995). Teaching within the rhythms of the semester. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  10. Elias, T. (2011). Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/965/1675 Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43 (7), 960-974.
  11. Friesen, N. (2008). Chronicles of change: The narrative turn and e-learning research. E-Learning and Digital Media, 5 (3). Retrieved from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/freetoview.asp?j= Eleaandvol=5andissue =3andyear =2008andarticle=6_Friesen_ELEA_5_3_web
  12. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-24.
  13. Gorsky, P., and Blau, I. (2009). Online teaching effectiveness: A tale of two instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/712/1270 Gunawardena, C.N., Nolla, A.C., Wilson, P.L., Lopez-Islas, J.R., Ramirez-Angel, N., and MegchunAlpizar, R.M. (2001). Across-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences.
  14. Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K., Land, S.M. & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 (3), 101-117.
  15. Harding, D. (2011, May). Is there a benefit to using flipchart software for individual student interaction? from https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vandpid=explorerandchrome=trueandsrcid=0B_l2PyVfd CVXZDEwMDM5MmUtNDRjOC00ZjEzLWE5YmQtZGI1ZDgwMGFmOGJhandhl=enandpli=1
  16. Henry, J., and Meadows, J. (2008). An absolutely riveting online course: Nine principles for excellence in web-based teaching. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(1). Retrieved from: http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/179/177
  17. Herrington, A. & Herrington, J. (2006). (Eds.). Authentic learning environments in higher education. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  18. Holly, M.L., Arhar, J., and Kasten, W.C. (2005). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  19. Howell, S.L., Saba, F., Lindsay, N.K., and Williams, P.B. (2004). Seven strategies for enabling faculty success in distance education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 33-49.
  20. Kemmis, S. (2011). Recognising and respecting diversity in understandings of practice. In C. Kanes (ed.), Elaborating professionalism: Studies in practice and theory, 5, 139-165. Pre-publication draft retrieved November 13, 2008, from: http://www.csu.edu.au/research/ripple/docs/Kemmis%20Prof%20Practice%20Chapter%20060419_14.pdf
  21. Lagier, J. (2003). Distance learning and the minority student: special needs and opportunities. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), 179-184.
  22. LaPointe, D.K., and Gunawardena, C.N. (2004). Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing. Distance Education, 25(1), 83-106.
  23. Long, G.L., Marchetti, C., and Fasse, R. (2011). The importance of interaction for academic success in online courses with hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1015/1952 Menchaca, M.P., and Bekele, T.A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231-252.
  24. Merrill, M.D. (1968). Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  25. Motteram, G., and Forrester, G. (2005). Becoming and online distance learner: What can be learned from students’ experiences of induction to distance programs? Distance Education, 26(3), 281-298.
  26. Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Parrish, P. (2005, March). Embracing the aesthetics of instructional design. Educational Technology. Retrieved from: http://homes.comet.ucar.edu/~pparrish/papers/parrish_revised.doc Parrish, P., and Linder-VanBerschot, J.A. (2010). Cultural dimensions of learning: Addressing the
  28. Postill, J. (2008, October 30). What is practice theory? Retrieved from: http://johnpostill.com/2008/10/30/what-is-practice-theory/ Romero, M., and Barbera, E. (2011). Quality of e-learners’ time and learning performance beyond
  29. Rovai, A.P., and Downey, J.R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147.
  30. Russo, T.C., and Campbell, S.W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviors and medium. Distance Education, 25(2), 215-232.
  31. Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  32. Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3 & 4), 207-231.
  33. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  34. Shipman, J. (2011, April). Exploring impacts of interactive whiteboard use in elementary school. Retrieved from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/54090044/Interactive-Whiteboard-Research-Paper Stringer, E.T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
  35. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22, 306-331.
  36. Valk, J.H., Rashid, A.T., and Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes:
  37. VoiceThread. (2011). Retrieved from http://voicethread.com/ Wallwisher. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.wallwisher.com/
  38. Wiesenberg, F. (2011). Designing and co-facilitating online graduate classes: Reflections and recommendations. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 30(2), P. 39-57. Retrieved
  39. Wood, D.J., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections