You are here:

Teaching Teachers for the Future: Building the Educational Technology Capacity of Pre-service Teachers in Australian Universities, Part 2
PROCEEDINGS

, The University of Queensland, Australia ; , University of Southern Queensland, Australia ; , , , University of Technology Sydney, Australia ; , Griffith University, Australia

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

The Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF) project is funded by the Australian Government’s Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) through the ICT Innovation Fund and is an $8.8 million project involving all 39 universities that are involved in teacher education. This symposium involves presenters from four of these universities who are working in various ways in the project. The first paper involves an overview of the project and a summary of some of the projects currently being conducted using the TPACK framework at the various universities. The second paper is on the evaluation strategy and provides a preliminary analyzes. The third paper explores the benefits of prospective teachers creating and sharing new media in their professional learning activities. The final paper is about a Social Ecological Model (SEM) has been used to positively inform integration support efforts of individual academics through their personal, institutional, professional, societal and temporal perspectives on ICT integration.

Citation

Campbell, C., Albion, P., Kearney, M., Maher, D., Pressick-Kilborn, K. & Zagami, J. (2012). Teaching Teachers for the Future: Building the Educational Technology Capacity of Pre-service Teachers in Australian Universities, Part 2. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2241-2248). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 22, 2021 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aubusson, P., & Fogwill, S. (2006). Role play as analogical modelling in science. In P. Aubusson, A. Harrison& S. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp.93-104). Dordrecht:
  2. Bryan, J.A. (2010). Investigating the conservation of mechanical energy using video analysis: Four cases. Physics Education, 45(1), 50 – 57
  3. De Mesquita, P.B., Dean, R.F., & Young, B.J. (2010). Making sure what you see is what you get: Digital video technology and the preparation of teachers of elementary science. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 275-293.
  4. Dickinson, G., & Summers, E.J. (2010). (Re)Anchored, video-centered engagement: The transferability of preservice training to practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 106-118.
  5. Girod, M., Bell, J., & Mishra, P. (2007). Using digital video to re-think teaching practices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(1), 23-29.
  6. Hakkarainen, P. (2009). Designing and implementing a PBL course on educational digital video production: Lessons learned from a design-based research. Educational Technology Research& Development, 57(2), 211-228.
  7. Hechter, R.P., Guy, M.D. (2010). Promoting creative thinking and expression of science concepts among elementary teacher candidates through science content movie creation and showcasing. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 411-431.
  8. Hoban, G. (2007). Using slowmation to engage preservice elementary teachers in understanding science content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 1-9.
  9. Hung, V.H.K., Keppell, M. & Jong, M.S.Y. (2004). Learners as producers: Using project based learning to enhance meaningful learning through digital video production. In R. Atkinson, & R. Phillips (Eds), Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 428-436). December 5-8, Perth, Australia
  10. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  11. Kearney, M. (2006). Prospective science teachers as e-learning designers. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 229-250
  12. Kearney, M. (2009). Investigating digital storytelling and portfolios in teacher education. In G. Siemens&
  13. Kozma, R. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in Chemistry. In M. Jacobson, & R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and maths education.
  14. Lloyd, M. (2009). Finding the "on" switch: Being a digital teacher in the 21st Century (pp. 97-119). In J.
  15. Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: SAGE Publications.
  16. McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topic-specific challenges of TPCK in science. In AACTE (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpck) for educators (pp. 193-206). New York and London: Routledge.
  17. Marsh, B., Mitchell, N. & Adamczyk, P. (2010). Interactive video technology: Enhancing professional learning in initial teacher education. Computers& Education, 54(3), 742-748
  18. Martin, S. & Siry, C. (2012). Using video in science teacher education: An analysis of the utilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin& C. McRobbie (Eds.) The second international handbook of science education (pp. 417-433). Dordrecht: Springer.
  19. Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2010). Video production as an instructional strategy: Content Learning and teacher practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 145-166
  20. Park, J. (2010). Digital video in science education. In G. Bull& L. Bell (eds). Teaching with digital video: Watch, analyze, create (pp. 81-106). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  21. Rich, P., & Hannafin, M.J. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52-67.
  22. Roby, T. (2010). Opus in the classroom: Striking CoRDS with content-related digital storytelling. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 133-144.
  23. Rubin, A., Bresnahan, S., & Ducas, T. (1996). Cartwheeling through CamMotion. Communications of the ACM, 39(8), 84 – 85.
  24. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2006). Capturing Learning through student-generated digital video. Australian Educational Computing. 21(1), 15-20
  25. Sherin, M. (2003). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (ed.) Using video in teacher education (pp.1-27). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  26. Shewbridge, W., & Berge, Z. (2004). The Role of Theory and Technology in Learning Video Production: The Challenge of Change. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 31-39. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
  27. Van Es, E. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education 28(2), 182– 192.
  28. Wong, D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Siebenthal, S. (2007). Teacher as filmmaker: iVideos, technology education, and professional development. In M. Girod & J. Steed (Eds.), Technology in the college classroom. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  29. Yerrick, R., Ross, D. & Molebash. P. (2005). Too Close for Comfort: Real-Time Science Teaching Reflections via Digital Video Editing. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 16(4), 351 – 375
  30. Yerrick, R., Thompson, M., McLaughlin, S., & MacDonald, S. (2011). Collected from the cutting room floor: An examination of teacher education approaches to digital video editing as a tool for shifting classroom practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 118-148.
  31. Zahn. C., Pea, R., Hesse, F.W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for collaborative design processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 1-38.
  32. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M.A., Koehler, M.J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454-262 Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read