You are here:

A simplified quality model for e-learning development and evaluation
PROCEEDINGS

, , Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, Brazil

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-90-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

The growth of distance education, specifically e-learning, requires further study and elaboration of a mechanism for improving the quality of the processes involved, considering the development of actions in different types of institutions (Education in general - Basic and Higher Education - Business). A review of these initiatives were translated into models, guides, standards that presents three approaches of utilization (evaluation, audit or certification) to be considered in institutions in terms of verifying the product and not the process. In other words, are not considered the steps involved in the development and maturation of the centers responsible for the preparation of both the material and institutional actions. In this sense, this work proposes a simplified model for development and evaluation of e-learning. So it helps with elements that allows measure the quality and allows the involved team monitors the process progress, challenges and steps to establish a high quality e-learning.

Citation

Rossi, R. & Mustaro, P. (2011). A simplified quality model for e-learning development and evaluation. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2011--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 878-883). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 28, 2021 from .

© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Baker, E.R., Fisher, M.J. & Goethert, W. (2007). Basic principles and concepts for achieving quality. CMU/SEI-TN-002.
  2. Barker, K.C. (2007). E-learnig quality standards for consumer protection and consumer confidence: a Canadian case study in e-learning quality assurance. Educational Technology& Society, Vol.10, 2007, pp.109-119.
  3. Chao, I.T., Saj, T. & Hamilton, D. (2010). Using collaborative course development to achieve online course quality standards. International Reviews of Reserch in Open and Distance Learning, Vol. 11, pp.106-126.
  4. Deming, W.E. (2003). Saia da Crise. Futura.
  5. Dick, W.O., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. 6th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  6. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J. & Wager, W.W. (1992). Priciples of instructional design. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  7. Humphrey, W.S. (1989). Managing the software process. Addison-Wesley.
  8. Perkins, J.E.P. (2008). Una introducció n a la educació n a distancia. Fondo de Cultura Econó mica.
  9. Pressman, R.S. (1995). Engenharia de Software. Makron Books.
  10. Rekkedal, T. (2006). State of the art report on distance learnig and e-learning quality for SMEs. E-learning Quality for SMEs: Guidance and Counselings. Available from, http://nettskolen.nki.no/in_english/elq-sme/ELQ-SMEStateofArt.pdf
  11. Schlemmer, E., Saccol, A.Z. & Garrido, S. (2007). Um modelo sistêmico de avalia ç ã o de software para educa ç ã o a distâ ncia como apoio à gestã o de EAD. Revista de Gestã o USP, Vol. 14, pp. 77-91.
  12. Shelton, K. (2011). A review of paradigms for evaluating the quality of online education programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 4, No 1.
  13. The Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line: benchmarks for success in internet-bases distance education.
  14. Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: promises, problems and possibilities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 5, Primavera 2002.
  15. West, C.K., Farmer, J.A. & Wolff, P.M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from Cognitive Science. Prentice-Hall.-883 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read