You are here:

Technology and Early Childhood Field Experiences

, Kean University, United States ; , University of Virgina, United States ; , Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, United States ; , New Jersey City University, United States ; , Georgia College & State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This panel will consider the role of technology integration in early childhood field experiences. Panelists will explore two approaches to field experience integration: partnering inservice and pre-service teachers in a field experience in educational technology and deliberate curriculum mapping of field experiences that require use of technology.


Rosen, D., Alexander, C., Blackwell, J., Bloom, A. & Woodham Digiovanni, L. (2011). Technology and Early Childhood Field Experiences. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4476-4481). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Alexander, C. & Kjellstrom, W. (2010). The influence of a technology-based internship on first-year teachers’ instructional decision-making. In D. Gibson& B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 2132-2137). Chesapeake, VA:
  2. Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411-434.
  3. Dawson, K., & Dana, N.F. (2007). When curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences and teacher inquiry coalesce: An opportunity for conceptual change? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (4), 656–667.
  4. Hammond, T.C. (2007). A task-oriented framework for stand-alone technology integration classes. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(4), 153-158.
  5. Dede, C., Honan, J.P., & Peters, L.C. (2005). Scaling up success: Lessons from technology-based educational improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Digiovanni, L.W., Schwartz, S., & Greer, C. (2009). I think, iPod(cast), I learn: Using digital media and podcasting in teacher education. In C. Maddux (Ed.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009. Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education/Association for Advancement of Computing in Education.-4480 DASHDASH
  7. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  8. Evans, B.P., & Gunter, G.A. (2004). A catalyst for change: Influencing pre-service teacher technology proficiency. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 41 (3), 325–336.
  9. Guskey, T.R. (2003). Professional development that works: What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), pp. 748-750.
  10. Hargrave, C.P., & Hsus, Y.S. (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for pre-service teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 303-314.
  11. Jones-Kavalier, B.R., & Flannigan, S.L. (2008). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century. Teacher Librarian, 35(3), 13-16.
  12. Kajder, S. (2005). "Not quite teaching for real:" Pre-service secondary English teachers' use of technology in the field following the completion of an instructional technology methods course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(1), 15-21.
  13. McIntyre, D.J., & Byrd, D.M. (1996). Preparing tomorrow's teachers: The field experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  14. Nasah, A., DaCosta, B., Kinsell, C., & Seok, S. (2010). The digital literacy debate: An investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research& Development, 58(5), 531-555. Doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9151-8
  15. O’Brien, D. & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66-68.
  16. Pierson, M., & Thompson, M. (2005). There-envisioned educational technology course: If addition isn't possible, try division. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(1), 31-36.
  17. Wang, Y. (2006). Stand-alone computer courses in teachers' IT training. Educause Quarterly, 29(3), 8-10. Retrieved from Wentworth, N., Graham, C.R., & Tripp, T. (2008). Development of teaching and technology integration: Focus on pedagogy. Computers in the Schools, 25 (1/2), 64–80.
  18. Willis, E.M., & De Montes, L.S. (2002). Does requiring a technology course in pre-service teacher education affect student teacher's technology use in the classroom? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(3), 76 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact