Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Web 2.0 tools encourage communication, collaboration, and creativity in an e-learning environment, enabling students to better connect with teachers and their peers both locally and around the world. Examples of Web 2.0 tools include wikis, Google Docs, glogs, Vokis, Animotos, and more. The benefits of using these tools include increased interactivity, faster and more meaningful collaboration, and the ability to incorporate multimedia with ease. As a solution to strained budgets, Web 2.0 tools also present a low-cost/no-cost approach to fostering teacher-student and student-student communication while still providing an authentic, cutting-edge learning environment for digital natives. By incorporating Web 2.0 tools in the classroom, K-12 and higher education teachers can harness the increasing capabilities of the Internet to improve e-learning opportunities for all students.
Bush, L. & Hall, J. (2011). Transforming Teaching with Technology: Using Web 2.0 Tools to Enhance On-line Communication, Collaboration, and Creativity. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3887-3890). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 17, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/36937/.
© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Berger, P. (2010). Student inquiry and Web 2.0. School Library Monthly, 26(5), 14-17.
- Byrne, R. (2009). The effect of Web 2.0 on teaching and learning. Teacher Librarian, 37(2), 50-53.
- Bush, L. (2009). Viva VoiceThread: Integrating a Web 2.0 tool in the additional language classroom. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings for Society of Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 3247-3250). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Dessoff, A. (2010). Google and Microsoft go to school. The Education Digest, 76(4), 4-7.
- Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J.E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research –What path should we take “now”? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
- Hargadon, S. (2010). Educational networking: The role of Web 2.0 in education. Multimedia& Internet@Schools, 17(2), 10-12, 14-16.
- Hazari, S., North, A., & Moreland, D. (2009). Investigating pedagogical value of wiki technology. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 189-198.
- Hedberg, J.G., & Brudvik, O.C. (2008). Supporting dialogic literacy through mashing and modding of places and spaces. Theory into Practice, 47(2), 138-149.
- Schrand, T. (2008). Tapping into active learning and multiple intelligences with interactive media. College Teaching, 56(2), 78-84.
- Simkins, M. & Schultz, R. (2010). Using Web 2.0 tools at school. Leadership, 39(3), 12-14, 38.
- Williams, J., & Chinn, S.J. (2009). Using Web 2.0 to support the active learning experience. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165-174.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Jeffrey Hall & Lucy Bush, Mercer University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 4124–4129
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.