You are here:

Project Based Educational Technology Professional Development
PROCEEDINGS

, The University of Auckland, New Zealand

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Our paper is a progress report on the provision of professional development workshops for educators within an institute of higher education. The aim of the workshops is to teach educators the necessary theoretical and practical skills to enable them to use Web 2.0 tools – blogs, wikis & social bookmarking – to enhance their teaching. We have refined the workshops over a two-year period in order to engage educators at a deep level with the potential of Web 2.0 tools for teaching. This resulted in a project based workshop format requiring participants to complete a learning design activity template. We instituted a more complex learning design template and research results reported in this paper indicate that this was a mistake. We have therefore returned to a more straightforward learning design template. We have also revised our post-workshop support model to try to increase the number of workshop participants who put what they learn into practice.

Citation

Doherty, I. (2011). Project Based Educational Technology Professional Development. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1807-1812). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. 1-64. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf Armstrong, R.J. (Ed.). (1970). Developing and Writing Behavioural Objectives. Tucson, Arizona: Educational Innovators Press.
  2. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  3. Biggs, J. (2008). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. Focus, 16(1), 1-3. Retrieved from http://learningandteaching.dal.ca/focus2/Vol16No1.pdf
  4. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I-The Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.
  5. Bower, M., Hedberg, J., & Kuswara, A. (2010). Conceptualising Web 2.0 enabled learning designs. Paper presented at the ascilite 2010, Auckland, New Zealand.
  6. Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
  7. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
  8. Desimone, L.M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
  9. Doherty, I. (2010). Staff Development Workshops for Teaching With Web 2.0 Tools. In C.D. Maddux, D. Gibson& B. Dodge (Eds.), Research Highlights in Information Technology and Teacher Education 2010 (pp. 61-70). Chesapeake, V.A:
  10. Fink, L.D. (2006). Active Learning. Retrieved 6th June, 2008, from http://www.ou.edu/pii/tips/ideas/model.html
  11. Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.
  12. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
  13. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2002). Patterns of Engagement in Authentic Online Learning Environments. Paper
  14. Maconachie, D. (2010). Benchmarking Academic Development. HERDSA News, 32, 16-17.
  15. Oh, E., & Reeves, T. (2008). Design Research vs. Instructional Systems Design: Implications for Educational Technologists.
  16. Reeves, T.C. (2006). Design Research From A Technology Perspective. In J.V.D. Akker, S. Gravemeijer, S. McKenny & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 52-66). London: Routledge.
  17. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design Research: A Socially Responsible Approach to Instructional Technology Research in Higher Education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96-115.
  18. Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Zeeng, L., Robbie, D., Adams, K.M., & Hutchison, C. (2010). Where’s my class? Using Web 2.0 for collaboration in a design environment. Paper presented at the ascilite 2010, Auckland, New Zealand.-1812 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.