You are here:

Instructional Technical and Pedagogical Design: Teaching Future Teachers Educational Technology
PROCEEDINGS

, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States ; , University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States ; , Indiana University, Bloomington, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper described a case study of informed educational technology design. The paper discussed how a conceptual guide for technology teacher experiences (Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Glazewski, & Newby, 2010) informed educational technology design in a course intended to prepare future teacher students to use technology. These students are introduced to various technologies and create materials for their future classrooms. They are also exposed to cases wherein they are required to make decisions on which technologies are most pedagogically appropriate. Therefore, the technology and pedagogy selected for this course are particularly important, as course instructors need to model appropriate decision-making.

Citation

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Millard, M. & van Leusen, P. (2011). Instructional Technical and Pedagogical Design: Teaching Future Teachers Educational Technology. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1615-1623). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Betrus, A.K., & Molenda, M. (2002). Historical evolution of instructional technology in teacher education programs. TechTrends, 46(5), 18-21, 33.
  2. Britten, J., Mullen, L., & Stuve, M. (2003). Initial reflections: The benefits of using a continuous portfolio development in preservice teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 39(2), 79-94.
  3. Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
  4. Kay, R.H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383-408.
  5. Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure (NCES 2008-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC.
  6. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762.
  7. Lasley, T.J., & Matczynski, T.J. (1995). Reflective teaching. In A.C. Ornstein (Ed.) Teaching: Theory into practice. Pp. 307 – 321.
  8. Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers' learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 194-200.
  9. Mims, C., Polly, D., Shepherd, C., Inan, F. (2006). Examining PT3 projects designed to improve preservice education. TechTrends, 50(3), 17-24
  10. Ohlund, B., & Yu, C. (2009). Threats to validity of research design. Retrieved on April 23, 2010, from http://www.creative-wisdom.com/teaching/WBI/threat.shtml Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K., & Newby, T. (2010). Preservice technology integration course revision: A
  11. Pellegrino, J., Goldman, S., Bertenthal, M., & Lawless, K. (2007). Teacher education and technology: Initial results from the “what works and why” project. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(2), 52-86.
  12. Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepard, C., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2010), 863-870.
  13. Project Tomorrow. (2008). 21st century learners deserve a 21st century education: Selected national findings of the Speak up 2007 survey. Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/speakup_congress_2007.html
  14. Rosaen, C., & Bird, T. (2005). Providing authentic contexts for learning information technology in teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 211-231.
  15. Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
  16. Weston, C., McAlpine, L., & Bordonaro, T. (1995). A model for understanding formative evaluation in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(3), 29-48.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.