You are here:

Converging Offerings of Teacher Education in Times of Austerity: Transforming Spaces, Places and Roles.
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , , , , , University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This panel debates effective strategies in web-enhanced and online teaching and learning in 2010 adopted by the University of Canterbury degree programme to prepare teachers for primary schools in our bi-cultural nation of Aotearoa New Zealand at a time of austerity worldwide. Students have the choice of three modes of study: on campus in Christchurch, nationwide distance study, and culturally sensitive regional blends including one with a strong indigenous focus in Rotorua. In 2010 over 700 students studied within the same set of online courses in the university’s LMS, regardless of the mode. Complementary blended learning transformations included merging lecture and lab spaces, including regional students via video conference more often, programme-wide student mentors, and blending web 2.0 tools such as Wikis and an ePortfolio. Transformation of roles, spaces and places has been achieved with strong professional and organizational development informed by theory, including TPACK.

Citation

Davis, N., Dabner, N., Mackey, J., Walker, L., Hunt, A.M., Breeze, D., Morrow, D., Astall, C. & Cowan, J. (2011). Converging Offerings of Teacher Education in Times of Austerity: Transforming Spaces, Places and Roles. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 224-229). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Compton, L.K., Davis, N.E., & Mackey, J. (2009). Virtual field experience in virtual schooling. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 459-477.
  2. Cowan, J. & Astall, C. (2010). Exploring collaborative learning: experiences with a web 2.0 tool in pre-service teacher education environment. Computers In New Zealand Schools, 22(3). Available online from http://education2x.otago.ac.nz/cinzs/mod/resource/view.php?id=117
  3. Davis, N.E. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. Voogt and G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. (507–520) Amsterdam: Springer.
  4. Davis, N.E., Mackey, J., McGrath, A., Morrow, D., Walker, L. & Dabner, N. (2010). Blending online and on-site spaces and communities: Developing effective practices. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (2696-2698) Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  5. Greenwood, J., Te Aika, L.H. & Davis, N.E. (2011). Creating virtual marae: An examination of how digital technologies have been adopted by M(cid:1)ori in Aotearoa New Zealand. In P.R. Leigh (ed.) International Explorations of Technology Equity and the Digital Divide: Critical, Historical and Social Perspectives. (58-79) Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
  6. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C.D. Maddux, (Ed.). Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (99-108). Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education.
  7. Hunt, A.M. (2007). Ten years on, where to next? Rotorua principals' perceptions of the Christchurch College of Education Rotorua regional initiative: a case study. Unpublished Masters of Education thesis. Christchurch, NZ: University of Canterbury.
  8. Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2009). A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 6-18.
  9. Karasavvidis, I. (2010). Wiki uses in higher education: exploring barriers to successful implementation, Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 219-231.
  10. Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567-605.
  11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  12. Morrow, D., & McGrath, A. (2010). Developing a collaborative constructivist framework for a mandatory preservice course in information and communication technology. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (3327-3330). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  13. Oblinger, D.G. (2006). Learning Spaces. Accessed January 30, 2011 from http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces
  14. Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2009). Introduction to blended learning practices. In E. Stacey& P. Gerbic (Eds.), Effective blended learning practices: evidence-based perspectives in ICT-facilitated education (pp. 1-19). Hershey, PA: Information Science
  15. Wilson, J. & Albion, P. (2009). Interaction, learner styles, and content in online courses: Implications for teacher preparation. In C. Maddux (Ed.). Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009. (347-354) Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.