You are here:

Moodle implementation and the RIPPLES model: Reflections on a sustainable approach to technology integration and renewal of educational practice

, , , Central Queensland University, Australia

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Toronto, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-81-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Consistent with the RIPPLES approach, this paper argues that aligning critical factors, such as Resources, Infrastructure, People, Policies, Learning and Support, to address the needs at different parts of the organisation, can provide an avenue for developing a collaborative learning environment for stakeholders involved in technology implementation. The paper provides an insightful overview of the institutional application of the RIPPLES model, to assist in the repositioning and renewal of academic practice, using the implementation of Moodle as one of the vehicles to support the transformation. In doing so, the paper highlights some strengths, weaknesses and opportunities pertaining to the strategies in place to support a sustainable approach to technology integration and renewal of educational practice. Descriptions of considerations and actions taken allow the reflective findings from the process to be reused by other institutions involved in a similar process of transformation.


Muldoon, N., Tennent, B. & Tickle, K. (2010). Moodle implementation and the RIPPLES model: Reflections on a sustainable approach to technology integration and renewal of educational practice. In J. Herrington & C. Montgomerie (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 345-354). Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 21, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Barone, C.A. (2003). The changing landscape and the new academy. EDUCAUSE Review, September/October.
  2. Benson, R. & Palaskas, T. (2006). Introducing a new management learning system: Aninstitutional case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 548-567. Accessed 28 January, 2009
  3. Birch, D. & Burnett, B. (2009). “Bringing academics on board: Ecouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 25(1), 117-134.
  4. Candy, P.C. (2004). Linking thinking: Self-directed learning in the digital age. Australian Department of Education, Science and Training.
  5. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical. Education, knowledge and action research. Falmer, Lewes.
  6. Chickering, A. & Ehrmann, S. (1996). Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever. Bulletin of the American Association for Higher Education, 49(2), 3-6.
  7. Central Queensland University (2008). Annual Report 2008. CQUniversity Australia, Rockhampton.
  8. Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987), Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
  9. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). “A critical examination of the effects of Learning Management Systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 19-36.
  10. Downes, S. (2005) E-learning 2.0. ELearn Magazine. Accessed 1 February 2008, http://+ & Article=29-1
  11. Ely, D.P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, 39, 23-27.
  12. Estminger, D.C. & Surry, D.W. (2008). “Relative ranking of conditions that facilitate innovation implementation in the USA”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 611-626.
  13. Graham, C.R. (2004). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In Bonk, C.J. & Graham C.R. (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives. Local Designs, San Francisco.
  14. Jones, D. & Muldoon, N. (2007) “The teleological reason why ICTs limit choice for university learners and learning.” Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Singapore.
  15. Kember, D. & Kelly, M. (1993). Improving teaching through action research. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia. Campbelltown.
  16. Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2005). “Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology”. Computers& Education, 49, 740-762.
  17. Krause, K-L. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. Centre for the Study of Higher Education: University of Melbourne.
  18. McConachie, J., Danaher, P., Luck, J. & Jones, D. (2005). Central Queensland University’s Course Management Systems: Accelerator or brake in engaging change? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1).
  19. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). E-Learning in Tertiary Education: Where do we stand? Paris, France: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develompent.
  21. Surry, D.W., Ensminger, D.C. & Haab, M. (2005). A model for integrating instructional technology into higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 327-329.
  22. Weller, M.J., Pegler, C.A. & Mason, R.D. (2005) Use of innovative technologies on an elearning course. The Internet and Higher Education 8(1), 61-71
  23. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Mass.
  24. Wise, L. & Quealy, J. (2006). “At the limits of social constructivism: Moving beyond LMS to re-integrate scholarship”. Proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? Sydney.
  25. Voss, C. (1992). Successful innovation and implementation of new processes. Business Strategy Review, 3(1), 29-44.
  26. Yabsley, B. (2009). Academic staff and student evaluation report: Results of the Moodle evaluation surveys 2009. CQUniversity Australia, Rockhampton.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact