You are here:

Future School research: A school’s response to the digital revolution, Part 1 PROCEEDINGS

, , , HWA CHONG INSTITUTION, Singapore ; , Murdoch University, Australia ; , , , , , , , , , HWA CHONG INSTITUTION, Singapore

Global Learn, in Penang, Malaysia ISBN 978-1-880094-79-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

This symposium will demonstrate how a whole school will potentially be re-invigorated by commitment to innovative practice using information and communications technologies. This symposium will share the strategies developed at one of the pilot schools in FutureSchools@Singapore in response to the challenge of preparing students for the digital revolution. The school employs two approaches in driving the initiative: (1) a project approach where tools and pedagogies are developed to customize for the purpose of the various school academic programs; and (2) a research approach to study how the tools, pedagogies, the settings and the people interact in the course of bringing about engaged learning. Findings from studies already implemented at the school or mature research plans to be implemented will be shared at the symposium.

Citation

Tey, J.A.H., Chung, W.C., Hon, C.W., Herrington, J., Ang, C.C., Khoo, K.P., Yip, C.W., Oon, H.L., Tan, A., Ang, S.H., Har, H.P., Gwee, H.N. & Tan, S. (2010). Future School research: A school’s response to the digital revolution, Part 1. In Z. Abas, I. Jung & J. Luca (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010--Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 1259-1263). Penang, Malaysia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Arnold, W. (2006). Singapore Acts as Haven for Stem Cell Research. In The New York Time. 17th August 2006.
  2. Brevik, P S. (2005). 21st Century Learning and Information Literacy. Change. March/ April 2005.
  3. Chong, M. (1999). Aspects of Human Geography. Singapore: Pekoe Books.
  4. Coll, R K. & Taylor, N. (2001). Alternative Conceptions of Chemical Bonding Held by Upper Secondary and Tertiary Students. Research in Science and Technological Education. 19(2): 171-191.
  5. Cox, J R. (2000). Teaching noncovalent interactions in the biochemistry curriculum through molecular visualisation. Journal of Chemical Education. 77: 1424-1428.
  6. Davydov, V V. (2009). The Influence of L S Vygotsky on Education Theory, Research and Practice. Educational Researcher. 24(3): 12-21.
  7. Geelan, D R. (1997). Epistemological Anarchy and the Many Forms of Constructivism. Science and Education. 6:15-28.
  8. Harrington, J. (2006). Authentic e-learning in higher education: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. In T C, Reeves& S, Yamashita (eds).Proceedings of World Conference on ELearning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.-1262 DASHDASH
  9. Lee, S K., Goh, C B. & Fredriksen B. (2008). Toward a Better Future: Education and Training for Economic Development in Singapore Since 1965. Washington: The World Bank. McHugh, J. (2005). Synching up with the iKid. Retrieved Feburary 10 2009.
  10. Parrill, A L. & Gerway, J. (1997). Fostering Curiosity-Driven Learning through Interactive Multimedia Representations of biological molecules. Journal of Chemical Education. 74: 1141-1142.
  11. Peterson, R., Treagust, D. & Garnett, P. (1986). Identification of secondary students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic instrument. Research in Science Education. 16(1): 40-48.
  12. Prensky, M. (2005). Learning in the Digital Age. Educational Leadership. 63(4); 8-13.
  13. Reid, D. (1980). Spatial involvement and teacher-pupil interaction patterns in school biology laboratories. Educational Studies. 6(1): 31-41.
  14. Reeves, T C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J, van den Akker., K, Graveneijer., S, Mc Kenny. & N, Nieveen (eds). Educational Design Research. London; Routledge.
  15. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2 (1): 3-10.
  16. Siemonkowski, F. & MacKnight, F. (1971). Spatial cognition: success prognosticator in college science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching. 1 : 56-59.
  17. Tan, W. (2008). After You have Taken your A-level Biology. Retrieved 2nd December 2008 from The Warren website: http://imwarren.blogspot.com/2008/11/after-you-have-taken-your-level-biology.html
  18. Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
  19. Ursyn, A. (1997). Computer Art Graphics Integration of Art and Science. Learning and Interaction, 7 (1), 65-86.
  20. Weiner, S W., Cerpovicz, P F., Dixon, D W., Harden, D B., Hobbs, D S. & Gosnell, D L. (2000). RasMol and mage in the Undergraduate Biochemistry Curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education.
  21. Wheatley, G., Frankland, R., Mitchell, R. & Kraft, R. (1978). Hemispheric specialization and cognitive development: implications for mathematics education. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. 9120-9130.
  22. Zahorik, J A. (1997). Encouraging—and Challenging—Students' Understandings. Educational Leadership. 54(6): 30-32.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.