You are here:

Towards student-centred uses of learning technologies in Malaysia
PROCEEDINGS

, Macquarie University, Australia ; , Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia ; , , Macquarie University, Australia

AACE Award

Global Learn, in Penang, Malaysia ISBN 978-1-880094-79-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

Based on a study of the use of the EDUWEBTV streaming video system in Malaysian schools this paper suggests some strategies for developing more student-centred pedagogies. The review of the system recommended more activity-based learning and the sharing of learning designs between teachers. At the same time an intervention has been designed to develop Malaysian pre-service teachers’ learning technology design capabilities so that they engage more collaborative and interactive learning. Exemplars that the students produced and their perceptions of the design experience evidence their paradigm shift towards more student-centred, collaborative and constructive pedagogies.

Citation

Bower, M., Fong, S.F., Hedberg, J. & Cameron, L. (2010). Towards student-centred uses of learning technologies in Malaysia. In Z. Abas, I. Jung & J. Luca (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010--Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 782-789). Penang, Malaysia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson& F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University. Retrieved November, 2009, from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/index.html
  2. Bastiaens, T., Merrienboer, J., & Hoogveld, B. (2002). A design strategy for complex e-learning. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. February 27-March 3.
  3. Bates, A.W., & Poole, G. (2003). Introductory remarks on knowledge, learning and teaching (Chapter 2). InEffective teaching with technology in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Bower, M. (2008). A 'pedagogy-first' approach to teaching learning design. In 2008 LAMS and Learning Design Conference, Sydney, Australia, 5th December (pp. 35-42): LAMS Foundation.
  5. De Boer, W., & Collis, B. (2002). A changing pedagogy in E-learning: From acquisition to contribution. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13(2), 87-101.
  6. Hedberg, J.G. (2008). Framing learning activities for the effective use of ICT. In N. Yelland, G. Neal, & E. Dakich, (Eds.), Rethinking Education with ICT: New directions for effective practices. (pp 31-44). Amsterdam: Sense Publishers.
  7. Procter, C. (2002). Proportion, pedagogy and processes: The three P’s of e-learning. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the International Academy for Information Management, Barcelona, Spain.
  8. Spector, M.J. (2001). Philosophical implications for the design of instruction. Instructional Science, 29, 381-402.
  9. Zemsky, R., & Massy, W.F. (2004). Thwarted Innovation: What happened to e-learning and why. A Final Report for The Weatherstation Project of The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania in cooperation with the Thomson Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: The learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved November 20, 2009 from http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.