You are here:

Developing TPACK in Pre-Service Secondary Mathematics Teachers through Integration of Methods and Modeling Courses: Results of a Pilot Study
PROCEEDINGS

, Montana State University - Bozeman, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Unless pre-service teachers actively learn mathematics with technology themselves, they may fail to see the value in integrating technology into instruction. This study examines the synergistic effects of concurrent enrollment in a mathematics teaching methods class and a technology-intensive mathematical modeling class as a way of helping pre-service teachers develop Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). This strategy is meant to ensure that all the three components of TPACK, technology, pedagogy and content, are attended to maximally. The mathematics teaching methods class is focused on Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) while the mathematical modeling class emphasizes Technological Content Knowledge (TCK). It is intended that the pre-service teachers make connections between TPK and TCK to build TPACK. Results of the pilot study indicate that pre-service teachers can indeed make desirable connections between TPK and TCK although the process through which that happens is complicated by other factors such as mathematics cognition.

Citation

Mudzimiri, R. (2010). Developing TPACK in Pre-Service Secondary Mathematics Teachers through Integration of Methods and Modeling Courses: Results of a Pilot Study. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3485-3490). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Cedillo, T., & Kieran, C. (2003). Initiating students into algebra with symbol-manipulating calculators. In Fey, J, M, Cuoco, A, Kieran, C, McMullin, L & Zbiek, R, M (Eds.) Computer Algebra Systems in Secondary School Mathematics Education (pp.219239)
  2. Ellington, A.J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433-463.
  3. Fleener, M.J. (1995) The relationship between experience and philosophical orientation: A comparison of pre-service and practicing teachers’ beliefs about calculators. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 14, 359-376.
  4. Forgasz, H. (2006) Factors that encourage or inhibit computer use for secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 25(1) 77-93.
  5. Goos, M. & Bennison, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 20(3) 102-130.
  6. Manoucherhri, A. (1999). Computers and school mathematics reform: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(1), 31 – 48.
  7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J.(2006) Technological pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college Record. 108(6) 1017-1054.
  8. Neiss, L. (2001). A model for integrating technology in pre-service science and mathematics content-specific teacher preparation. School Science& Mathematics. 101(2) 102-109.
  9. Schmidt, M.E. (1998). Research on middle grade teachers’ beliefs about calculators. Action in Teacher Education, 20(2), 11-23.
  10. Tharp, M.L., Fitzsimmons, J.A., & Ayers, R.L.B. (1997). Negotiating a technological shift: Teachers perception of the implementation of graphing calculators. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science, 16, 551-575.
  11. Thomas, M.J., Bosley, T., Hong, Y.Y., & Santos, A.G. (2008). Use of calculators in the mathematics classroom. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology 2(2), 229-242.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides