You are here:

Relationship of Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge with their Vocational Self-Efficacy Beliefs
PROCEEDINGS

, Selcuk University, Turkey ; , Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Turkey ; , Iowa State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

In the present study, the relationships between teacher candidates’ academic achievements in technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge areas were analyzed. All of the three individual knowledge domains were significantly related to each other. Also, preservice teachers’ vocational self-efficacy beliefs were analyzed through the lens of their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). It was found that the participants who received high grades in all of the three knowledge bases had the highest vocational self-efficacy beliefs. Results from this research study suggest that the three knowledge constructs should be treated in an integrated manner, not as separate constructs. Findings from the current study show that vocational self-efficacy served as a useful variable to find out the importance of TPACK. Overall, this study was conducted as an attempt to understand TPACK in detail and to help teacher educators and preservice teachers integrate the computer and other educational technologies into their curricula.

Citation

Sahin, I., Akturk, A.O. & Schmidt, D. (2009). Relationship of Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge with their Vocational Self-Efficacy Beliefs. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4137-4144). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 292-302.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  3. Bednar, M.R., & Sweeder, J.J. (2005). Defining and applying idea technologies: A systematic, conceptual framework for teachers. Computers in the Schools, 22(3/4), 35-47.
  4. Buckenmeyer, J.A., & Freitas, D.J. (2005). No computer left behind: Getting teachers on board with technology. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
  5. Collier, S., Weinburgh, M.H., & Rivera, M. (2004). Infusing technology skills into a teacher education program: Change in students’ knowledge about and use of technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 447-468.
  6. Dexter, S., Doering, A.H., & Riedel, E.S. (2006). Content area specific technology integration: A model and resources for educating teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 325-345.
  7. Ferdig, R.E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749-760.
  8. Harris, J.B., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2007). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  9. Hicks, T. (2006). Expanding the conversation: A commentary toward revision of Swenson, Rozema, Young, McGrail, and Whitin. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 46-55.
  10. Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345-362.
  11. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences informing technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302
  12. Kahyaoglu, M., & Yangin, S. (2007). Views of prospective teachers in elementary teaching departments about professional self-efficacy. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(1), 73-84.
  13. Kanuka, H. (2006). Instructional design and e-learning: A discussion of pedagogical content knowledge as a missing construct. The e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9(2). [online]. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/ejist/docs/vol9_no2/papers/full_papers/kanuka.htm
  14. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski. L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
  15. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers& Education, 49, 740-762.
  16. Lambert, J., & Sanchez, T. (2007). Integration of cultural diversity and technology: Learning by design. Meridian Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 10(1). [online]. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2007/pinballs/index.htm
  17. Lawless, K.A., & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007) Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
  18. Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 38(4), 424-430.
  19. Maller, P. (2000). On the role of outcome expectancies in computer usage prediction (Master’s Thesis, The University of Alabama, 2000).
  20. Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R.W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427-462.
  21. Mertler, C.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical applications and interpretation. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak. Miller, S.M. (in press). Teacher learning for new times: Repurposing new multimodal literacies and digital video composing for schools. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. New York: International Reading Association/Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  22. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  23. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  24. Niess, M.L. (2006). Guest editorial: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), 195-203.
  25. Pierson, M.E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
  26. Rowley, J., Dysard, G., & Arnold, J. (2005). Developing a new technology infusion program for preparing tomorrow’s teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 105-123.
  27. Sahin, I. (2008). From the social-cognitive career theory perspective: A college of education faculty model for explaining their intention to use educational technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 51-66.
  28. Schrum, L., Thompson, A., Maddux, C., Sprague, D., Bull, G., & Bell, L. (2007). Editorial: Research on the effectiveness of technology in schools: The roles of pedagogy and content. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 456-460.
  29. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  30. Strawhecker, J. (2005). Preparing elementary teachers to teach mathematics: How field experiences impact pedagogical content knowledge. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 4. [online]. Retrieved December 19, 2007, from http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/curriculum/strawhecker/article.pdf Sweeder, J., & Bednar, M.R. (2001). “Flying” with educational technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(3)

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.