You are here:

Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States
Article

, Arizona State University, United States ; , University of Nevada Las Vegas, United States

CITE Journal Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

With the increasing popularity and accessibility of the Internet and Internet-based technologies, along with the need for a diverse group of students to have alternative means to complete their education, there is a major push for K-12 schools to offer online courses, resulting in a growing number of online teachers. Using the Tailored Design survey methodology (Dillman, 2007), this study examines a national sample of 596 K-12 online teachers and measures their knowledge with respect to three key domains as described by the TPACK framework: technology, pedagogy, content, and the combination of each of these areas. Findings indicate that knowledge ratings are highest among the domains of pedagogy, content, and pedagogical content, indicating that responding online teachers felt very good about their knowledge related to these domains and were less confident when it comes to technology. Correlations among each of the domains within the TPACK framework revealed a small relationship between the domains of technology and pedagogy, as well as technology and content (.289 and .323, respectively). However, there was a large correlation between pedagogy and content (.690), calling into question the distinctiveness of these domains. This study presents a beginning approach to measuring and defining TPACK among an ever-increasing number of K-12 online teachers.

Citation

Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved January 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Archambault, L. M., & Crippen, K. J. (2006). The preparation and perspective of online K-12 teachers in Nevada. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1836-1841). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
  2. Cavanaugh, C., & Blomeyer, B. (2007). What works in K-12 online learning. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Christensen, C. M., & Horn, M. B. (2008). How do we transform our schools? [Electronic version]. Education Next, 13-19. Retrieved from http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/18606339.html
  4. Czaja, R., & Blair, J. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  6. Fowler, J. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  7. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  8. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  9. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). New York: Routledge.
  10. Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Hass, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rate. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79-104.
  11. McEwan, H., & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316-334.
  12. McLeod, S., Hughes, J. E., Brown, R., Choi, J., & Maeda, Y. (2005). Algebra achievement in virtual and traditional schools. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Learning Point Associates.
  13. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  14. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  15. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  16. Shih, T., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from Web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis.Field Methods, 20(3), 249-271.
  17. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: MacMillan.
  18. Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2006). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of statelevel policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. In Search of Leaders: Exploring the Technology Comfort Levels and Efficacies of Pre-Service and Early Career School Librarians

    Daniella Smith, University of North Texas, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 565–570

  2. Unpacking TPACK: reconsidering knowledge and context in teacher practice.

    Michael Phillips, Monash University, Australia; Matthew Koehler & Joshua Rosenberg, Michigan State University, United States; Benjamin Zunica, Monash University, Australia

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2422–2429

  3. Examining Perceptions and Decision-making Related to Technology Integration in the Common Core High School Classroom

    Medha Dalal, Leanna Archambault, Rolando Robles & Anna Reed, Arizona State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2302–2310

  4. MtEceK - A Project to Investigate Teacher Knowledge of Early Childhood Teachers in Hong Kong

    Kam Ling Lao, Open University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 1450–1453

  5. Examining Teachers’ Technology Use Through Digital Portfolios

    Sarah Keenan, Joshua Rosenberg, Spencer Greenhalgh & Matthew Koehler, Michigan State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 1084–1091

  6. Overcoming Obstacles to Effective Online Instruction

    Jered Borup, George Mason University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 162–165

  7. Pipe dreams or digital dreams: Technology, pedagogy and content knowledge in the vocational educational and training sector

    Teresa O’Brien & Dorit Maor, Murdoch University

    ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2013 (2013) pp. 647–651

  8. Does the use of the TPACK model enhance digital pedagogies: We don’t understand the present so how can we imagine the future?

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University

    ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2013 (2013) pp. 531–540

  9. Measuring TPACK in Vietnam: Issues still remain

    Kathy Jordan, Huong Dinh & Jennifer Elsden-Clifton, RMIT University, Australia

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 851–856

  10. Designing a tool to support teachers with the TPACK framework

    Fei Fang, Learning Technologies, College of Education & Human Development, University of Minnesota, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015 (Oct 19, 2015) pp. 1079–1084

  11. A performance assessment of teachers’ TPACK using artifacts from digital portfolios

    Joshua Rosenberg, Spencer Greenhalgh & Matthew Koehler, Michigan State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3390–3397

  12. An International Investigation of TPACK

    Petrea Redmond, University of Southern Queensland, Australia; Yehuda Peled, Western Galilee College, Israel

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3384–3389

  13. Views of Social Science Teachers and Preservice Teachers on their TPACK Perceptions

    Ozkan Akman, Cemal Guven, S. Ahmet Kiray & Ismail Celik, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3032–3039

  14. Current Tensions: A Review of Technology Integration Models Utilized by Pre-Service Teacher Educator Programs

    Kristin Elwood & Wilhelmina Savenye, Arizona State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 2295–2300

  15. A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT

    Joyce Koh, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 29, No. 6 (Dec 23, 2013)

  16. Today’s Student and Virtual Schooling: The Reality, the Challenges, the Promise…

    Michael Barbour, Wayne State University

    Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Vol. 13, No. 1 (2009) pp. 5–25

  17. Conducting Classroom Observations to Understand TPACK: Moving Beyond Self-reported Data

    Shu-Ju Diana Tai & Denise Crawford, Center for Technology in Learning & Teaching, Iowa State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 2661–2664

  18. Using lesson plans as a proxy for teacher technology integration practices in math and science using TPACK: A transferrable research design

    Kara Dawson & Albert Ritzhaupt, University of Florida, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1398–1404

  19. Exploring Factors Influencing K-12 Teachers Information-Seeking Behaviors on Educational Portals

    I-Ling Cheng, School of Information Sciences- Library and Information Science Program, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Daqing He, School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Brenda G. Jordan, Asian Studies Center, University Center for International Studies,University of Pittsburgh, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 1831–1839

  20. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Secondary Mathematics Teachers

    Handal Boris, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Australia; Chris Campbell, The University of Queensland, Australia, Australia; Michael Cavanagh & Peter Petocz, Macquarie University, Australia, Australia; Nick Kelly, The University of Sydney, Australia

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 13, No. 1 (March 2013) pp. 22–40

  21. [Chais] Teachers in a World of Change: Teachers' Knowledge and Attitudes towards the Implementation of Innovative Technologies in Schools

    Orit Avidov-Ungar & Yoram Eshet-Alkalai, Open University, Israel

    Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2011) pp. 291–303

  22. Teaching Geometry with Technology: A Case Study of One Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

    Ewelina McBroom, Southeast Missouri State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 4828–4836

  23. Connecting the Dots Between the Technology Professional Development Needs of Teachers and Technology Implementation

    Daniella Smith, University of North Texas, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 1044–1048

  24. Tessellations in TPACK: Comparing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Levels Among K-12 Online and Traditional Teachers

    Kent Sabo & Leanna Archambault, Arizona State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 4751–4756

  25. Using Structured Interviews to Assess Experienced Teachers’ TPACK

    Judi Harris, College of William & Mary, United States; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States; Mark Hofer, College of William & Mary, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 4696–4703

  26. A Case Study of ICT Integration during Field Experience in Malaysian Secondary School.

    Hasniza Nordin, Donna Morrow & Niki Davis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 4275–4280

  27. Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Office Data Processing Teachers Technology Knowledge

    Bolaji Adegbenro, TSHWANE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, MSTE DEPARTMENT, South Africa; Willy Mwakapenda, Tshwane University of Technology, MSTE, Department, South Africa; Oludayo Olugbara, Durban University of Technology, South Africa

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 4191–4199

  28. Breaking SPORE: Aligning Video Game Affordances to Science Pedagogy

    Peter Schrader & Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States; Joshua Keilty, Alexander Dawson School, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 2618–2625

  29. Student Demographics and Technology Integration in Online Distance Education Courses

    Lynette Phyfe & Richard Hechter, University of Manitoba, Canada

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 768–769

  30. Does the TPACK framework help to design a more engaging learning environment?

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia; Pauline Roberts, School of Education, Murdoch University, Australia

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3498–3504

  31. A case study of the differences between experienced and in-experienced math teachers' TPACK

    Ting-ling Lai, Tamkang University, Taiwan; Hsiao-Fang Lin, MingDao University, Taiwan

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3051–3055

  32. The Practitioner’s Perspective on Teacher Education: Preparing for the K-12 Online Classroom

    Leanna Archambault, Arizona State University, United States

    Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 19, No. 1 (January 2011) pp. 73–91

  33. Differences between enrolled in an integrated course and did not in TPACK and technology integration for preservice teachers

    Shih-Hsiung Liu, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan

    Global TIME 2011 (Feb 22, 2011) pp. 171–176

  34. Explicitly Addressing TPACK in Preservice Teacher Curriculum

    Mia Kim Williams, University of Northern Colorado, United States; Keith Wetzel, Teresa Foulger, Todd Kisicki & Lisa Giacumo, Arizona State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 4429–4434

  35. Teachers’ assessment of TPACK: Where are we and what is needed?

    Joke Voogt, University of Twente, Netherlands; Tae Shin, University of Central Missouri, United States; Punya Mishra & Matt Koehler, University of Michigan, United States; Denise Schmidt, Evrim Baran, Ann Thompson & Wei Wang, Iowa State University, United States; Ghaida Alayyar, Petra Fisser, Douglas Agyei & Bart Ormel, University of Twente, Netherlands; Chantal Velthuis, Edith Stein University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands; Jo Tondeur, University of Ghent, Belgium; David Gibson, Global Challenge, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 4422–4426

  36. Pre-Service Teachers’ Experience with ICT Integration in Secondary Schools: A Case Study of One New Zealand Context.

    Hasniza Nordin, Donna Morrow & Niki Davis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 3915–3920

  37. Using SEM to Move from Theory to Practice with the TPACK Framework

    Brandy Jones & Jill Adelson, University of Louisville, United States; Leanna Archambault, Arizona State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 2518–2525

  38. Digital Storytelling at School. Does the TPCK Model Explain What’s Going On?

    Nicoletta Di Blas, Paolo Paolini & Aldo Torrebruno, Politecnico di Milano - HOC LAB, Italy

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 2239–2248

  39. Hybrid Mode of Instruction in a Business School: Deployment Parameter and Reference

    Leny R. Dellosa, Centro Escolar University, Philippines

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 937–946

  40. Examining the validity of the TPACK framework from the ground up: Viewing technology integration through teachers’ eyes.

    M Brooke Robertshaw & Ronald B. Gillam, Utah State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3926–3931

  41. Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric

    Judi Harris, College of William & Mary, United States; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States; Mark Hofer, College of William & Mary, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3833–3840

  42. The Validation of an Instrument Measuring TPACK

    Nicolette Burgoyne, Charles R. Graham & Richard Sudweeks, Brigham Young University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3787–3794

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.