You are here:

Mentoring Professors: A Model for Developing Quality Online Instructors and Courses in Higher Education Article

, , , Purdue University Calumet, United States

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This article presents a four-stage model for mentoring faculty in higher education to deliver high quality online instruction. It provides a timeline that shows the stages of program implementation. Known as the Distance Education Mentoring Program, its major outcomes include certified instructors, student achievement, and the attainment of a competitive advantage in the tight student market for higher education. The program's benefits to the mentor, protégé, and the organization are discussed.

Citation

Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J. & Feldman, L. (2010). Mentoring Professors: A Model for Developing Quality Online Instructors and Courses in Higher Education. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(1), 7-26. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. 25AACSB. (2007). Quality issues in distance learning, The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, available: http://www.aacsb.edu/Resource_Centers/DeansResources/Quality-issues-final.pdf
  2. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Sloan-C, available: http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005. Report of The Sloan Consortium of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bell, C.R. (1998). Managers as mentors, San Francisco, CA: Barrett-Koehler. Boyer, Ernest L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Cunningham, S. (1999). The nature of workplace mentoring relationships among faculty members in Christian higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 441-463.
  6. Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  7. Dreher, G.F., & Ash, R.A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology (75), 539-46.
  8. Eaton, J.S. (2001). Distance learning: Academic and political challenges for higher education accreditation, Council for Higher Education Accreditation, available: http://www.chea.org/events/qualityassurance/98may.html
  9. Fagan, M.M. (1986). Do formal mentoring programs really mentor?” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mentoring, Volume 2, Vancouver, B.C.: International Association for Mentoring.
  10. Florida Trend. (1992). TQM: You need it to survive. Florida trend.
  11. Hendricks, W. (1996). Coaching, mentoring, and managing, Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
  12. Holmes, G., & Abington-Cooper, M. (2002). Pedagogy vs. Andragogy: A false dichotomy? The Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2),
  13. Knowles, M.S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education, New York: Cambridge, The Adult Education Company.
  14. Knowles, M.S. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species, Houston: Gulf.
  15. Kram, K. (1985). Mentoring at work, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
  16. LeCroy, N.A., & McClenney, K. (1992). To walk on water: Challenges for community college faculty, In Kroll, K. (Ed.), Maintaining Faculty Excellence. New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 79, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Levinson, D. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Balentine.
  18. Lokken, F., & Wormer L. (2007). Trends in e-learning: Tracking the impact of e-learning in higher education, Washington, DC: Instructional Technology Council, available: http://www.itcnetwork.org/ Mod/resource/view.php?inpopup=true&id=77
  19. MacArthur, C.A., & Pilato, V. (1995). Mentoring: An approach to technology education for teachers. 26 Barczyk, Buckenmeyer, and Feldman
  20. Marx, S. (2005). Improving faculty use of technology in a small campus community. T.H.E. Journal 32(6), 21-23.
  21. MarylandOnline. (2006). Quality Matters: Inter-institutional quality assurance in online learning, available: http://www.qualitymatters.org
  22. Maslow, A.H. (1970). Motivation and personality, 2nd edition, New York: Harper& Row.
  23. Murray, M., & Owen, M.A. (1991). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring: How to facilitate an effective mentoring program. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  24. Odiorne, G.S. (1985). Mentoring– An American management innovation, personnel administrator, Alexandria, VA: American Society for Personnel Administration.
  25. Palmer, P.J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  26. Penner, R. (2001). Mentoring in higher education. Direction, 30(1), 45-52. St. Clair, K.L. (1994). Faculty-to-faculty mentoring in the community college: An instructional component of faculty development. Community College Review, 22(3), 23-35.
  27. Seidman, E. (1985). In the words of faculty: Perspectives on improving teaching and educational quality in community colleges, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  28. Weinstein, E. (1998). Mentoring for success. Des Moines, IA: American Media.
  29. Wexley, K., & Latham G. (2002). Developing and training human resources in organizations, Third edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Acknowledgement the authors are indebted to suzanne degges-White, martine duchatelet,

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Exploring the Feasibility of a Web-based Learning Community System for Professional Development of E-learning Faculty in the Context of Higher Education in Kenya

    Francis Kibaru, University of Missouri - Columbia, United States; Rose Njoroge, Kenyatta University, Kenya

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 627–630

  2. Technologically Mediated Delivery in Higher Education: The Margin as a Site for Change

    Judith Lapadat, University of Northern British Columbia, Canada

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 796–804

  3. Designing High-Impact Faculty Programs for Online Course Development

    Emily Hixon & Janet Buckenmeyer, Purdue University Calumet, United States; David Freitas, Indiana University South Bend, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 1771–1777

  4. Building Community and Sharing Knowledge: Team Teaching an Online Class

    Meng-Fen Grace Lin, Unversity of Hawaii, United States; Michael Herrick, June Davids & Huei-Wen Charlotte Tsai, University of Hawaii, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010 (Jun 29, 2010) pp. 2225–2233

  5. Does Participating in an Online Course Development Program

    Emily Hixon, Janet Buckenmeyer, Casimir Barczyk & Lori Feldman, Purdue University Calumet, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2009 (Jun 22, 2009) pp. 2387–2390

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.