You are here:

Toward a Virtual Field Trip Model for the Social Studies
Article

, College of William & Mary, United States

CITE Journal Volume 9, Number 4, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

In the current state of social studies education, field trips are being cut from many schools’ curriculum. While not a true substitution, today’s technologies provide some opportunities through virtual field trips (VFTs) to simulate these experiences, engage students in knowledge production and disciplined inquiry, and have interactions with the dedicated staff members from these historic sites. Many of the current VFTs, however, fall short of this goal and instead serve as an updated form of a content delivery model, with little interaction or student engagement in historical issues. This article describes research on field trips, hybrid distance learning models, and virtual field trips in the social studies and other areas, as well as a critical case study of one of the most prominent and long lasting virtual field trips, Colonial Williamsburg’s Electronic Field Trip program. A model for future social studies VFTs and ways to integrate these VFTs into authentic social studies instruction are developed. The case study revealed a number of key issues that arise in the development and execution of VFT programs, and the ensuing VFT model should be helpful for teachers and VFT developers.

Citation

Stoddard, J. (2009). Toward a Virtual Field Trip Model for the Social Studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 412-438. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 27, 2023 from .

© 2009 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bellan, J., & Scheurman, G. (1998). Actual and virtual reality: Making the most of field trips. Social Education, 62(1), 35–40.
  2. Bergin, D., Anderson, A. Molnar, T., Baumgartner, R., Mitchell, S., Korper, S., Curley, A., & Rottman, J. (2007). Providing remote accessible field trips (RAFT): An evaluation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 192-219.
  3. Cassady, J., Kozlowski, A., & Kornmann, M. (2008). Electronic field trips as interactive learning events: Promoting student learning at a distance. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 439-454.
  4. Confar, P. (1995). Field trips worth the effort: Open your students’ eyes and show them the world firsthand. Learning, 23(6), 34-36.
  5. Conklin, H.G. (2008). Promise and problems in two divergent pathways: Preparing social studies teachers for the middle school level. Theory and Research in Social Education, 36(1), 591-620.
  6. Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27(2), 197-215.
  7. Doering, A. (2007). Adventure learning: Situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate-Journal of Online Education, 3(6).
  8. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  9. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task oriented to learning oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763-779.
  10. Gubala, B., & Acer, K. (2006). Are we there yet? Virtually. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9). Available from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6952/is_9_87/ai_n28349052/?t Ag=content;col1
  11. Hammond, T. C., & Manfra, M. M. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss2/socialstudies/article1.cfm
  12. Heuvel, L. (2008a). Educators’ use of Colonial Williamsburg electronic field trips and related Web resources. Williamsburg, VA: Colonial Williamsburg Office of Educational Outreach.
  13. Heuvel, L. (2008b). Survey data of Colonial Williamsburg electronic field trip subscribers. [Unpublished raw data].
  14. Lacina, J. (2004). Designing a virtual field trip. Childhood Education, 80(4), 221-222.
  15. Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2005). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  16. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher’s College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  18. Nespor, J. (2000). School field trips and the curriculum of public spaces. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 25-43.
  19. Newmann, F., King, B., & Carmichael, D. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment: Common standards for rigor and relevance in
  20. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards for authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8-12.
  21. Noel, M. (2007). Elements of a winning field trip. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(1), 42-44.
  22. Noel, M., & Colopy, M. (2006). Making history field trips meaningful: Teachers’ and site educators’ perspectives on teaching materials. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(3), 553-568.
  23. Priest, M., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Learning in museums: Situated cognition in practice. Journal of Education in Museums, 15, 16-18.
  24. Riedel, E., Doering, A., Scharber, C., & Ernst, D. (2007, April). “Timber for president”: Adventure learning and motivation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  25. Shaffer, D., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195-215.
  26. Spicer, J., & Stratford, J. (2001). Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 345-354.
  27. Stainfield, J., Fisher, P., Ford, B., & Solem, M. (2000). International virtual field trips: a new direction? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 255-262.
  28. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  29. Tuthill, G., & Klemm, E. B. (2002). Virtual field trips: Alternatives to actual field trips. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 453-468.
  30. VanSledright, B. A. (2004). What does it mean to think historically…and how do you teach it? Social Education, 68(3), 230-233.
  31. Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703-713.
  32. Willis, A. (1999). Content-rich commercial websites (World Wide Web sites for social sciences). Social Education, 63(3).
  33. Wilson, E. (1997). A trip to historic Philadelphia on the web. Social Education, 61(3), 170-72.
  34. Wilson, E., Rice, M., Bagley, W., & Rice, M. K. (2000). Virtual field trips and newsrooms: Integrating technology into the classroom. Social Education 64(3), 152-55.
  35. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections