You are here:

Virtual Voices: Online Teachers' Perceptions of Online Teaching Standards Article

, Longwood University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 17, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Online teachers’ perceptions of online teaching standards published in 2006 by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) and the National Education Association (NEA). Interviews with two teachers from each of the four online schools were studied following an online survey of 49 online teachers from these schools. Overall, participants reported that both sets of standards as being important but found the NEA standards to be slightly more relevant to their practice. The qualitative data, both interviews and open-ended questions on the survey, revealed these themes related to the national standards: concerns about the language of the standards; the standards’ failure to acknowledge how much the roles of individual online teachers vary, depending on the school and course model; differentiation between online and face-to-face teaching; aspects of the standards participants endorsed; omissions participants perceived in the standards; participants’ lack of awareness of the standards; and the importance of online teachers having experience as online learners. The paper concludes with recommendations for policy and research.

Citation

Smith, R.D. (2009). Virtual Voices: Online Teachers' Perceptions of Online Teaching Standards. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 547-571. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved July 19, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Albion, P., & Maddux, C. (2007). Editorial: Networked knowledge: Challenges for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 303-310.
  2. American Federation of Teachers Higher Education Program and Policy Council. (2000, May). Distance education: Guidelines for good practice. Retrieved June 3, 2006, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/higher_ed/distance.pdf
  3. Blomeyer, R. L. (2006, Spring). Professional development for effective teaching and online learning. Virtual School Report published by Connections Academy. Retrieved August 4, 2009, from http://www.connectionsacademy.com/Libraries/PDFs/virtualnewsspring2006.sflb.ashx
  4. Darabi, A. A., Sikorski, E. G., & Harvey, R. B. (2006, May). Validated competencies for distance teaching. Distance Education, 27, 105-122.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Introduction. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). San Francisco: Josssey-Bass.
  6. Davis, M. R. (2007, June 20). How to ensure online courses are higher-caliber. Education Week Digital Directions. Retrieved August 30, 2007, from http://edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/06/20/01sr_elearning.h01.html
  7. Davis, N. E., & Roblyer, M. D. (2005, Summer). Preparing teachers for the “schools that technology built”: Evaluation of a program to train teachers for virtual schooling. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 399-409.
  8. Davis, N., & Rose, R. (2007, November). Professional development for virtual schooling and online learning. NACOL Research Committee Issues Brief. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from http://www.nacol.org/docs/NACOL_PDforVSandOlnLrng.pdf
  9. Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007, May). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28, 65-79.
  10. Ferdig, R.E., Cavanaugh, C., Di Pietro, M., Black, E.W., & Dawson, K. (2009). Virtual schooling standards and best practices for teacher education [Special issue]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 479-502.
  11. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
  12. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(1), 65-72.
  13. Mehta, S. (2007, February 18). More students across US logging on to online classrooms: Time restraints, jobs, yen for AP classes all factors. Boston.com. Retrieved March 17, 2007,
  14. National Education Association (NEA). (2006, November). Guide to teaching online. Retrieved November 8, 2006, from http://www.nea.org/technology/images/onlineteachguide.pdf
  15. North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL). (2007, September). National standards of quality for online courses. Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://www.inacol .org/resources/nationalstandards/NACOL%20Standards%20Quality%20Online%20Courses%202007.pdf
  16. North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL). (2008, February). National standards for quality online teaching. Retrieved February 23, 2008, from http://www.inacol .org/resources/nationalstandards/NACOL%20Standards%20Quality%20Online%20Teaching.pdf
  17. North American Council for Online Learning and the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007, November). Virtual schools and 21st century skills. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www.nacol.org/docs/VSand21stCenturySkillsFINALPaper.pdf
  18. Pape, L. (2007, November). Developing effective online teachers. Keeping pace with k12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from http://www.nacol.org/docs/KeepingPace07-color.pdf
  19. Picciano, A. G., & Seaman, J. (2007, March). K-12 online learning: A survey of U.S. School district administrators. Retrieved May 13, 2007, from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/survey/pdf/K-12_Online_Learning.pdf
  20. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
  21. Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2007, November). Going virtual: The status of professional development for K-12 online teachers. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from http://edtech.boisesTate.edu/goingvirtual/goingvirtual1.pdf
  22. Sammons, M. (2003). Exploring the new conception of teaching and learning in distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 387-397). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23. Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2005). A synthesis of new research on K-12 online learning. Retrieved January 5, 2007, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/synthesis/synthesis.pdf
  24. Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (2006a, October). Online teaching evaluation for state virtual schools. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/pubs/2006Pubs/06T04_Online_teaching_evaluation_checklist. Pdf
  25. Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (2006b, October). Standards for quality online teaching. Retrieved October 7, 2006, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/pubs/PDF/StandardsQualityOnlineTeaching.asp
  26. U. S. Department of Education (USDOE). (2005). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations (National Education Technology Plan 2004). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/index.html
  27. Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2006, October). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://www.nacoL.org/docs/Keeping%20Pace%20with%20K-12%20Online%20Learning%202006.pdf
  28. Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2007, November). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from http://www.nacol.org/docs/KeepingPace07-color.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.