You are here:

Preparing to Teach Mathematics with Technology: An Integrated Approach to Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Article

, , North Carolina State University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 8, Number 4, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Several organizations have highlighted the importance of preparing teachers to teach students mathematics using appropriate technology (e.g., Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, 2006; International Society for Technology in Education, 2008). This article provides examples from teacher education materials that were developed using an approach that integrally develops teachers' understandings of content, technology, and pedagogy to prepare them to teach data analysis and probablity topics using specific technology tools.

Citation

Lee, H. & Hollebrands, K. (2008). Preparing to Teach Mathematics with Technology: An Integrated Approach to Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 326-341. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved November 14, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge.
  2. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2006). Preparing teachers to use technology to enhance the learning of mathematics: A position of the Association of 334 Mathematics Teacher Educators. Retrieved from http://www.amte.net/Approved%20AMTE%20Technology%20Position%20Paper.pdf
  3. Battista, M., & Clements, D. (2000) Mathematics curriculum development as a scientific endeavor. In A. Kelly& R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 737-760). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  4. Bowers, J., Kenehan, G., Sale, J., & Doerr, H.M. (2000, February). Designing multimedia case studies for preservice teachers: Pedagogical questions and technological design solutions. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 444-556)
  5. Bowers, J., Kenehan, G., Sale, J., & Doerr, H.M. (2000, February). Designing multimedia case studies for preservice teachers: Pedagogical questions and technological design solutions. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 444-556)
  6. Garfield, J.B. (2003). Assessing statistical reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal 2(1), 22–38. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ2(1).pdf
  7. Garfield, J.B. (2003). Assessing statistical reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal 2(1), 22–38. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ2(1).pdf
  8. Garofalo, J., Drier, H.S., Harper, S., Timmerman, M.A., & Shockey, T. (2000). Promoting appropriate uses of technology in mathematics teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, [Online serial] 1(1), Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/mathematics/article1.htm
  9. Garofalo, J., Drier, H.S., Harper, S., Timmerman, M.A., & Shockey, T. (2000). Promoting appropriate uses of technology in mathematics teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, [Online serial] 1(1), Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/mathematics/article1.htm
  10. Hollebrands, K.F., Wilson, P.H., & Lee, H.S. (2007, October). Prospective teachers use of a videocase to examine students’ work when solving mathematical tasks using technology. Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North American Chapter, Lake Tahoe, UT. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/8/8/5/6/pages18 8561/p188561-1.php
  11. Hollebrands, K.F., Wilson, P.H., & Lee, H.S. (2007, October). Prospective teachers use of a videocase to examine students’ work when solving mathematical tasks using technology. Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North American Chapter, Lake Tahoe, UT. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/8/8/5/6/pages18 8561/p188561-1.php
  12. Hollebrands, K.F., Wilson, P.H., & Lee, H.S. (2008). Understanding prospective mathematics teachers' processes for making sense of students' work with technology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  13. Hollebrands, K.F., Wilson, P.H., & Lee, H.S. (2008). Understanding prospective mathematics teachers' processes for making sense of students' work with technology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  14. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForTeachers/NETS_for_Teachers.htm
  15. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForTeachers/NETS_for_Teachers.htm
  16. Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H., & Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education faculty. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 567-595.
  17. Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H., & Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education faculty. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 567-595.
  18. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  19. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  20. Konold, C., & Miller, C. (2004). TinkerPlots™ Dynamic Data Exploration (Version 1.0). Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
  21. Konold, C., & Miller, C. (2004). TinkerPlots™ Dynamic Data Exploration (Version 1.0). Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
  22. Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1998). Teaching, mathematics, and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
  23. Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1998). Teaching, mathematics, and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
  24. Leatham, K. (2006, January). Characterizing the preparation of preservice secondary mathematics teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Paper presented at The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Tampa, FL. Slides retrieved from http://www.mathed.byu.edu/%7Ekleatham/ResearchProjects/AMTEpresentation2006.htm
  25. Leatham, K. (2006, January). Characterizing the preparation of preservice secondary mathematics teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Paper presented at The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Tampa, FL. Slides retrieved from http://www.mathed.byu.edu/%7Ekleatham/ResearchProjects/AMTEpresentation2006.htm
  26. Lee, H.S., Hollebrands, K.F., & Wilson, P.H. (2007). Preservice mathematics teachers’ design and use of probability simulations. Slides available at http://www.ncsu.edu/project/ptmt/PTMT_NCTM2007Symposium.pdf URL DOESN'T
  27. Lee, H.S., Hollebrands, K.F., & Wilson, P.H. (2007). Preservice mathematics teachers’ design and use of probability simulations. Slides available at http://www.ncsu.edu/project/ptmt/PTMT_NCTM2007Symposium.pdf URL DOESN'T
  28. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  30. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey of information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology and the International Society for Technology in Education.
  31. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey of information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology and the International Society for Technology in Education.
  32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  34. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  35. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  36. Niess, M.L. (2006). Guest editorial: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss2/mathematics/article1.cfm
  37. Niess, M.L. (2006). Guest editorial: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss2/mathematics/article1.cfm
  38. Pea, R.D. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Hillsdale, NJ:
  39. Pea, R.D. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Hillsdale, NJ:
  40. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  41. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  42. Simon, M.A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
  43. Simon, M.A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
  44. Simon, M.A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 6(2), 91-104.
  45. Simon, M.A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 6(2), 91-104.
  46. Suharwoto, G. (2006). Secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ development of technology pedagogical content knowledge in subject-specific, technology-integrated teacher preparation program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.
  47. Suharwoto, G. (2006). Secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ development of technology pedagogical content knowledge in subject-specific, technology-integrated teacher preparation program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.
  48. Towers, J. (1998). Close encounters of the complex kind: Using videotapes in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 625). Author Note The Preparing to Teach Mathematics With Technology project is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE 04-42319 awarded to North Carolina State University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. More information about the project and materials can be found at http://www.ncsu.edu/project/ptmt.
  49. Towers, J. (1998). Close encounters of the complex kind: Using videotapes in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 625). Author Note The Preparing to Teach Mathematics With Technology project is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE 04-42319 awarded to North Carolina State University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. More information about the project and materials can be found at http://www.ncsu.edu/project/ptmt.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Secondary Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Selection and Way of Integration

    Erol Uzan, Indiana University Bloomington, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2030–2034

  2. The Role of Technology in Supporting Students’ Mathematical Thinking: Extending the Metaphors of Amplifier and Reorganizer

    Milan Sherman, Drake University, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 14, No. 3 (September 2014) pp. 220–246

  3. Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model

    Syh-Jong Jang & Meng-Fang Tsai, Chung-Yuan Christian University

    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 29, No. 4 (Sep 22, 2013)

  4. Implementing Large Scale Mobile Learning School Programs: To BYOD or not to BYOD

    Boris Handal, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Australia; Robert Ritter, The University of Alberta, Canada; David Marcovitz, Loyola University Maryland, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 796–801

  5. Prospective Teachers' Statistical Problem Solving with Dynamic Technology:

    Hollylynne S. Lee, North Carolina State University, United States; Gladis Kersaint, University of South Florida, United States; Suzanne R. Harper, Miami University, United States; Shannon O. S. Driskell, University of Dayton, United States; Keith Leatham, Brigham Young University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 4925–4938

  6. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Content Analysis of 2006-2009 Print Journal Articles

    Mario Kelly, Hunter College, City University of New York, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3880–3888

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.