Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
The purpose of this study is to examine preservice teachers' development of and the complex interplay between teachnology, pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK) with respect to teacher knowledge and practice. A longitudinal study has been designed to measure preservice teachers' knowledge development of TPACK throughout their teacher preparation program. Baseline data will be collected prior to preservice teachers' enrollment in a required, 3-credit technology course and then additional data will be collected from them when they complete the technology course, when they complete their methodology courses, and when they complete student teaching. Specifically, this paper describes the development of the survey that is designed to measure preservice teachers' attitudes, their self assessment of TPACK and their demonstration of TPACK.
Schmidt, D., Baran Sahin, E., Thompson, A. & Seymour, J. (2008). Developing Effective Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) in PreK-6 Teachers. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5313-5317). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 16, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28124/.
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1996). Constructing the Teachers' Attitudes Toward Computers (TAC) Questionnaire. Paper presented to the Southwest Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, January, 1996.
- Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (1998). Internal consistency reliability for the Teachers' Attitudes Toward Information Technology (TAT) questionnaire. In McNeil, Price, Boger-Mehall, Robin& Willis (Eds.), Technology and Teacher Education Annual 1998-Vol. 2. Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Knezek, G.A., Christensen, R.W., Miyashita, K.T. & Ropp, M.M. (2000). Instruments for assessing educator progress in technology integration. Denton, TX: Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from, < http://www.iittl.unt.edu > http://www.iittl.unt.edu
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
- Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- Pollard, C. & Pollard, R. (2005). Research priorities in educational technology: A delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 145-160.
- Schrum, L., Thompson, A., Sprague, D., Maddux, C., McAnear, A., Bell, L., & Bull, G. (2005). Advancing the field: Considering acceptable evidence in educational technology research. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5(3/4). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/editorial/article1.cfm
- Seymour, J.R. & Lehrer, R. (2006). Tracing the evolution of pedagogical content knowledge as the development of interanimated discourses. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 549-582.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Michael Phillips, Monash University, Australia; Matthew Koehler & Joshua Rosenberg, Michigan State University, United States; Benjamin Zunica, Monash University, Australia
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2422–2429
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.