You are here:

Exploring the Effect of Computer Mediated Communication Tools on Online Learners’ Participation and Learning: A Review of Research PROCEEDINGS

, , , , OISE/UT, Canada

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Quebec City, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-63-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Constructivist approaches (Vygotsky, 1978) to online learning in higher education, emphasize the opportunities for collaborative work among online students. Although the number of online courses is dramatically increasing, the question of how synchronous and asynchronous Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) tools affect online students' learning and their willingness to contribute to collaborative and community building activities (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) has not been rigorously answered. In this review of literature four major themes surfaced with regards to the effects of various CMC tools in the design and implementation process of online courses. Also, issues that call for further studies were identified.

Citation

Najafi, H., Ellis, S., Cox, K. & Calvert, D. (2007). Exploring the Effect of Computer Mediated Communication Tools on Online Learners’ Participation and Learning: A Review of Research. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2007--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 6341-6346). Quebec City, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Chou, C. (2001). Formative evaluation of synchronous CMC systems for a learner-centered online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2), 173-192.
  2. Dickey, M.D. (2004). The impact of web-logs (blogs) on student perceptions of isolation and alienation in a webbased distance-learning environment. Open Learning, 19(3), 279-291
  3. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  4. Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148
  5. Hafner, W. & Ellis, T.J. (2004). Project-based asynchronous collaborative learning. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, US.
  6. Hrastinski, S. (2006). Introducing an informal synchronous medium in a distance learning course: how is participation affected? Internet and Higher Education,9(2), 117-131.
  7. Im, Y., Lee, O. (2004). Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 155-170.
  8. Kim, K.J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C.J. (2005). Online MBA students' perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges and suggestions. Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335-344.
  9. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
  10. Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: a collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 85-103
  11. Muirhead, B. (2000). Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated distance education. Educational Technology& Society, 3(4), 1-11.
  12. Newberry, B. (2005). The use of bulletin boards for discussions in online learning. Retrieved March 6, 2007 from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Nov%5F05/article04.htm
  13. Nicholson, S. (2002). Socialization in the “virtual hallway”: Instant messaging in the asynchronous web-based distance education classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 363-372.
  14. Northrup, P., Lee, R., Burgess, V. (2002). Learner perceptions of online interaction. Ed-Media World Conference. Retrieved February 26, 2007 from http://www.aace.org/DL/
  15. Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., & Stephenson, H. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: students' attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409-431.
  16. Rovai, A.P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research& Development, 49(4), 33–48.
  17. Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: a case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90.
  18. Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213 – 230.
  19. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Young, A., Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. Internet and Higher Education 9, 107–115.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.