You are here:

Motivational Challenges of Adult Learners in Self-Directed e-Learning
Article

, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea (South)

Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 20, Number 3, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Learner motivation is a key to effective instruction and is critical to creating a successful online learning environment; yet, there is a paucity of theory and empirical research on how to create a motivating online learning environment. The purpose of the present study was to explore and describe the experiences of adult learners in a self-directed e-learning environment, thereby helping us understand the motivational challenges that they face during their learning process. To this end, twelve adult learners who had taken self-directed e-learning courses in either academic (e.g., universities) or workplace settings were interviewed on their motivations in self-directed e-learning. Results of this qualitative interview study showed that learners found courses with a low degree of interactivity and lacking in the application and integration of content by the learner motivationally challenging. In contrast, courses that provide learners with authentic and interactive learning activities, such as animations and simulations, a positive learning climate, and the control over the pace and sequence of instruction were found motivating to the learner. It is expected that the descriptions of the motivational challenges of learners in the present study provide researchers and practitioners with an empirical basis on and insights into how to enhance the motivational design of self-directed e-learning courses.

Citation

Kim, K.J. (2009). Motivational Challenges of Adult Learners in Self-Directed e-Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(3), 317-335. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 3, 2023 from .

© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alessi, S.M., & Trollip, S.R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Bonk, C.J. (2002). Online training in an online world. Bloomington, IN: CourseShare.
  3. Bonk, C.J., & Dennen, V. (2003). Frameworks for research, design, benchmarks, training, and pedagogy in Web-based distance education. In M.G. Moore& W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 331-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Chang, M.M., & Lehman, J. (2001). Making web-based instruction more relevant: Lessons from a research study. Paper presented at the Topics on Distance Learning Conference Proceedings Hammond, IN.
  5. Chen, S.Y., & Paul, R.J. (2003). Editorial: Individual differences in web-based instruction-an overview. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 385-392.
  6. Chyung, S.Y. (2001). Systematic and systemic approaches to reducing attrition rates in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 36-49.
  7. Coldeway, D.O. (1991). Patterns of behavior in individualized distance education courses. Research in Distance Education, 3(4), 6-10.
  8. Condry, J., & Chambers, J. (1978). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. In M.R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Cornell, R., & Martin, B.L. (1997). The role of motivation in Web-based instruction. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 93-100). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
  10. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
  11. Diaz, D.P. (2002). Online drop rates revisited. Technology Source (May/June). Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
  12. Essex, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from "distressed" students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233-239.
  13. Firdyiwek, Y.(1999). Web-based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy? Educational Technology, 39(1), 29-34.
  14. Frith, K.H. (2001). Effect of conversation on nursing student outcomes in a Web-based course on cardiac rhythm interpretation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
  15. Galvin, T. (2002, October). 2002 industry report. Training, 24-73.
  16. Garrison, R.D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In M.G. Moore& W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 113-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Gibson, C.C. (1998). The distance learner's academic self-concept. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 65-76). Madison,
  18. Hills, H. (2003). Individual preferences in e-learning. Burlington, VT: Gower.
  19. Islam, K. (2002, May). Is e-learning floundering?: Identifying shortcomings and preparing for success. E-Learning Magazine.
  20. Jung, I., & Rha, I. (2000). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online education: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(4), 57-60.
  21. Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructionaldesign theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Mahwah, NJ:
  22. Keller, J.M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally 334 Kim
  23. Klingner, B.G. (2003). The relationship between learning styles of adult learners enrolled in online courses at Pace University and success and satisfaction with online learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis.
  24. Lepper, M.R., & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  25. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  26. Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J.C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1).
  27. Maeher, M.L. (1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 443-462.
  28. Malone, T.W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically-motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.
  29. Merrill, D.M. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
  30. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  31. Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  32. Plowman, L. (1996). Narrative, linearity, and interactivity: Making sense of interactive multimedia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 92-105.
  33. Relan, A. (1992). Motivational strategies in computer-based instruction: Some lessons from theories and models of motivation. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Washington, DC.
  34. Ritchie, D.C., & Hoffman, B. (1997). Incorporating instructional design principles with the WorldWide Web. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 135-138). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
  35. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  36. Song, S.H. (2000). Research issues of motivation in Web-based instruction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1(3), 225-229.
  37. Song, S.H., & Keller, J.M. (1999). The ARCS model for developing motivationally-adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
  38. Song, S.H., & Keller, J.M. (2001). The ARCS model for developing motivationally-adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 5-22.
  39. Stokes, S.P. (2003). Temperament, learning styles, and demographic predictors of college student satisfaction in a digital learning environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS.
  40. Stoney, S., & Wild, M. (1998). Motivation and interface design: Maximising learning opportunities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(1), 40-50.
  41. Visser, L., Plomp, T., Amirault, R.J., & Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating students at a distance: The case of an international audience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 94-110.
  42. Visser, L., Plomp, T., & Kuiper, W. (1999). Development research applied to improve motivation in distance education. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
  43. Wagner, E.D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29.
  44. Wagner, E.D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. In T.E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs (pp. 19-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  45. Walberg, H.J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.
  46. Wlodkowski, R.J. (1993). Enhancing adult motivation to learn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  47. Wolcott, L.L., & Burnham, B.R. (1991). Tapping into motivation: What adult learners find motivating about distance education. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
  48. Zvacek, S.M. (1991). Effective affective design for distance education. TechTrends, 36(1), 40-43. Notes 1The Knowledge Base is an online database of information on computer and Internet technologies offered as a service by the university the participant was affiliated with.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections