Electronic Field Trips as Interactive Learning Events: Promoting Student Learning at a Distance
Jerrell C. Cassady, Alison Kozlowski, Ball State University, United States ; Mark Kornmann, National Park Foundation, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 19, Number 3, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Creating authentic digital learning experiences associated with classic field trip locations is a growing educational practice. One form of this developing field of educational programming is an electronic field trip, which involves student activities, teacher curriculum, and a live broadcast from the target location. This study provides the first nationwide large-scale investigation of the effectiveness of electronic field trips in promoting student learning. Data analyses on 1,568 participants' responses to a 32-item test created by the educational programming staff at the Grand Canyon National Park demonstrated that students with access to all components of the field trip (prebroadcast learning materials in addition to the live programming) showed the greatest levels of performance. Furthermore, analyses of individual item difficulty indices demonstrated that content presented via multiple streams of communication enjoyed the greatest growth scores when comparing the students with and without full access to the learning materials.
Cassady, J.C., Kozlowski, A. & Kornmann, M. (2008). Electronic Field Trips as Interactive Learning Events: Promoting Student Learning at a Distance. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 439-454. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24187/.
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Beale, A. V. (2000). Elementary school career awareness: A visit to the hospital. Journal of Career Development, 27(1), 65-72.
- Bromham, L., & Oprandi, P. (2006). Evolution online: Using a virtual learning environment to develop active learning in undergraduates. Journal of Biological Education, 41(1), 21-25. Cassady, J. C., & Mullen, L. J. (2006). Reconceptualizing electronic field trips: A Deweyian perspective. Learning, Media, and Technology, 31(2), 149-161.
- Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
- Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22-28.
- Farmer, A. J., & Wott, J. A. (1995). Field trips and follow-up activities: Fourth graders in a public garden. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 33-36.
- Hartman, B.A., Miller, B. K., & Nelson, D. L. (2000). The effects of hands-on occupation versus demonstration on children’s recall memory. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(5), 477-483.
- Henry, C. K. (1992). Retention and recall of images: Evaluating museum experiences of schoolchildren. Visual Arts Research, 18(2), 82-92.
- Hudson, J. A., & Fivush, R. (1991). As time goes by: Sixth graders remember a kindergarten experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 347-360.
- Kisiel, J. (2006). More than lions tigers and bears--creating meaningful field trip lessons. Science Activities, 43(2), 7-10. Knapp, D.
- Kolb, D., Boyatzis, R.E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R.J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. Mahwah, New Jersey: LEA.
- Manzanal, R. F., Barreiro, L. M. R., & Jimenez, M. C. (1999). Relationship between ecology fieldwork and student attitudes towards environmental protection. Journal in Reasearch in Science Teaching, 36(4), 431-453.
- McCarthy, R. (1989). Multimedia: What the excitement’s all about. Electronic Learning, 8, 26-31. McLoughlin, A.S. (2004). Engineering active and effective field trips. Clearing House, 77(4), 160-163.
- Murachver, T., Pipe, M.E., Gordon, R., Owens, J. L., & Fivush, R. (1996). Do, show, and tell: Children’s event memories acquired through direct experience, observation, and stories. Child Development, 67, 3029-3044.
- Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423-451.
- Powell, K., & Wells, M. (2002). The effectiveness of three experiential teaching approaches on student science learning in fifth-grade public school classrooms. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(2), 33-38.
- Schank, R.J. (1994). Active learning through multimedia. Multimedia, 1, 69-79.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Virtual Field Trip Learning Model with Inquiry learning and Critical Thinking process : Perspective from Science teachers Synthesis
Jaemjan Sriarunrasmee, Praweenya Praweenya Suwannatthacho & Pimpan Dechakupt, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University Thailand, Thailand
Global Learn 2011 (Mar 28, 2011) pp. 1900–1905
Toward a Virtual Field Trip Model for the Social Studies
Jeremy Stoddard, College of William & Mary, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 9, No. 4 (December 2009) pp. 412–438
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.