You are here:

E-Learning Teams and Their Adult Learning Efforts in Corporate Settings: A Cross Analysis of Four Case Studies
Article

, , University of Houston, United States

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 7, Number 2, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Four cases relating to the efforts of e-learning teams in valuing adult learners in their e-learning solutions were examined to better understand how e-learning teams value their adult learners within corporate settings. Two questions guided the analysis of the cases, they are

  1. What is the nature of the e-learning solutions in these cases?
  2. What strategies did the e-learning teams used to value adult learners?
    The nature of the e-learning solutions in these cases resulted in descriptions about e-learning context, e-learning format, types, and numbers of courses. The strategies that e-learning teams used to value adult learners related to front-end analysis, content selection, content sequence, and presentation, interactions, standards, assessments, locations, and transfer. The analysis illustrated that e-learning teams and their efforts to value adult learners in their e-learning solutions are influenced by factors such as team size, team talent, company size, and technology. The results of the cross-case analysis offer a synthesis that e-learning teams can use for benchmarking and evaluation.

Citation

Stewart, B. & Waight, C. (2008). E-Learning Teams and Their Adult Learning Efforts in Corporate Settings: A Cross Analysis of Four Case Studies. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 293-309. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Comacchio, A., & Scapolan, A. (2004). The adoption process of corporate e-learning in Italy. Education and Training, 46(6/7), 315-325.
  4. Herie, M. (2005). Theoretical perspectives in online pedagogy. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(1/2), 29-52.
  5. Huberman, A. B., & Miles, M. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 228-244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. Johnson, S.D., & Aragon, S.R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. In S.A. Aragon (Ed.), Facilitating learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (No. 10, pp. 31-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Knowles, M.S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kruse, K., & Kiel, J. (2000). Technology-based training. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. LaPointe, D. K., & Gunawardena, C.N. (2004). Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computermediated conferencing. Distance Education, 25(1), 85-106.
  7. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  8. Mason, R.M. (1993). Strategic information systems: Use of information technology in a learning organization. Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 840-849). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
  9. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Munro, J. (1998). Presence at a distance: The educator-learner relationship in distance learning. American Center for the Study of Distance Education Research Monograph 16. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
  10. Newton, D., & Ellis, A. (2005). Effective implementation of e-learning: A case study of the Australian Army. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(5/6), 385-397.
  11. Noe, R.A. (2004). Employee training and development (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. (1995). Cognition, teaching, and assessment. New York:HarperCollins. Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw Hill.
  12. Shin, N. (2002). Beyond interaction: The relational construct of “transactional presence”. Open Learning, 17(2), 121-137.
  13. Waight, C.L., Willging, P., & Wentling, T.L. (2004). Recurrent themes in e-learning: A narrative analysis of major e-learning reports. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(3), 195-203. Waight, C. L., & Stewart, B. L. (2005). Valuing the adult learner in e-learning: Part two – insights from four companies. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(5/6), 398-414.
  14. Yang, B.(2004). Can adult learning theory provide a foundation for human resource development? Advances for Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 129-145.
  15. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.