You are here:

A Learner-Centered Online Syllabus Generator System
PROCEEDINGS

, , Old Dominion University, United States

AACE Award

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-58-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

A well-designed syllabus provides students with a roadmap for an engaging and successful learning experience, whereas a poorly designed syllabus impedes communication between faculty and students, increases student anxiety and potential complaints, and reduces overall teaching effectiveness. In an effort to facilitate, streamline and improve overall syllabi quality, the Center for Learning Technologies at Old Dominion University (ODU) designed a web-based learner-centered syllabus generator system. This online tool enables faculty to easily create, adapt and share course syllabi; without the inefficiencies, inconsistencies and time constraints associated with the traditional ways of preparing syllabi.

Citation

Abdous, M. & He, W. (2006). A Learner-Centered Online Syllabus Generator System. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1095-1101). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 21, 2022 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abrams, D., Baecker, R., & Chignell, M. (1998). Information archiving with bookmarks: personal web space
  2. Eberly, B., Newton, E., & Wiggins, R. (2001). The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. Journal of General Education 50 (1), 56-74. Retrieved September 5, 2005 , from the Journal of General Education website: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_general_education/v050/50.1eberly.pdf
  3. Garavalia, S., Hummel, H., Wiley, P., & Huitt, G. (1999). Constructing the course syllabus: Faculty and student
  4. Habanek, D. (2005). An examination of the integrity of the syllabus. College Teaching, 53(2), 62-64.
  5. Matejka, K., & Kurke, B. (1994). Designing a great syllabus. College Teaching, 42 (3), 115-117.
  6. Parkes, J. & Harris, B. (2002). The purposes of a syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55-61.
  7. Parkes, J., Fix, K., & Harris, B. (2003). What syllabi communicate about assessment in college classrooms. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14 (1), 61-83.
  8. Richardson, S., Newton, M., & Mathis, J. (2004). Undergraduate Council Sub-Committee Report Standardization of Syllabi. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from the University of Utah website: http://www.polisci.utah.edu/pdf/syllabus_guidelines.pdf
  9. Robinson, J.R. (1995). Radical systems development: An introduction to rapid application development. Chapel Hill, NC: Professional Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References