You are here:

Comparison of Nursing Student Perceptions and Attitudes toward Hybrid & Online Courses
PROCEEDINGS

, , , University of Hawaii at Hilo, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-58-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract: Since the online learning environment has been introduced to nursing education there has been needs to study the flexible learning conditions for nursing students. The numeral teaching and learning methods and delivery modalities are available. In order to implement a best-fit method that suits the unique nursing education situations, a better understanding of nursing students' perceptions and their attitudes toward these new teaching and learning approaches and their delivery modalities are necessary. This paper presents a comparison study that investigates the nursing students' perceptions and attitudes toward academic courses taught and delivered by using the Hybrid and Online modalities.

Citation

Urso, P., Chen, B. & Chi, R. (2006). Comparison of Nursing Student Perceptions and Attitudes toward Hybrid & Online Courses. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 576-581). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 17, 2022 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bennett, E., Mims, N., & McKenzie, B. (2003). Assessing Distributed Learning: Student Perceptions and Future Directions. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. 2002, pp. 2379-2382.
  2. Berge, Z.L. (1999). Interaction in Post-Secondary Web-Based Learning. Educational Technology. 1999, 39(1), pp 5-11.
  3. Boora, R. (2004). Back to Basics: Hybrid Learning and Comfortable Computing. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2004 (pp. 499-505).
  4. Caropreso, E., & Chen, S. (2003). The Impact of Personality on Collaborative Online Learning. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. 2003 (pp. 2371-2375).
  5. Cen, H. (2003). Partial Online Learning Environment-An Alternative of Online Learning and Face-to-Face Learning. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 280-281).
  6. CSUO (2005), Colorado State University-Pueblo, http://ceeps.colostatepueblo.edu/nursing/hybridOnline.htm
  7. Cuellar, N. (2002). The Transition from Classroom to Online Teaching. Nursing Forum, 2002, 37(3)5-13.
  8. Dehler, C., & Porras-Hernandez, L.H. (1998). Using Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) to Promote Experiential Learning in Graduate Students. Educational Technology. 1998, 38(3) 52-55.
  9. Fishman, B. (2000). How Activity Fosters CMC Tool Use in Classrooms: Reinventing Innovations in Local Contexts. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 2000, 11 (1) pp 3-27.
  10. Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Online and Face-To-Face Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments. 2000, 11(1), pp 29-49.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References