You are here:

Documenting Value Added Learning Through Videoconferencing: K-12 Classrooms’ Interactions with Museums
PROCEEDINGS

, Evaluation Consortium, United States ; , , Project VIEW, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-57-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

Project VIEW, a Federal (US) Technology Innovation Challenge Grant, has developed a model for integrating in-depth content of external providers into K-12 curriculum through interactive videoconferencing. Research and evaluation indicate that the model facilitates the development of programs through support not only of direct student outcomes, but also by addressing three current systemic educational initiatives. These initiatives, collaborative outcomes, alignment of teaching modalities with standards, and student-centered learning, are strengthened via the Project VIEW approach to videoconferencing. The paper addresses the role of Project View in supporting these initiatives and summarizes evidence of effective practices.

Citation

Newman, D., Barbanell, P. & Falco, J. (2005). Documenting Value Added Learning Through Videoconferencing: K-12 Classrooms’ Interactions with Museums. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2005--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 389-401). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Dede, C. (2001). A new century demands new ways of learning. In D.T. Gordon (Ed.), The digital classroom (pp.171-174).
  2. Falco, J., Newman, D.L., & Barbanell, P. (2003). New vision, new realities: Methodology and mission in developing interactive videoconferencing programming. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Museum and the Web 2003. Abstract retrieved September 9, 2005, from http://www.archimuse.com/mw2003/abstracts/prg_200000739.html
  3. Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 1-23.
  4. Greenberg, A. (2004, February). Navigating the sea of research on videoconferencing-based distance education: A platform for understanding research into the technology’s effectiveness and value. Retrieved September 9, 2005, from Wainhouse Research Website: http://www.wainhouse.com/files/papers/wr-navseadistedu.pdf
  5. Jeffers, C. (2003). Gallery as Nexus. Art Education, 1, 21.
  6. Motamedi, V. (2001). A critical look at the use of videoconferencing in United States distance learning. Education, 122(2), 386394.
  7. Newman, D.L., Barbanell, P., & Falco, J. (2003, November). New vision, new reality: A model for creating and evaluating interactive cable archives and videoconferencing in civic education. Paper presented at the international conference on Civic Education Research, New Orleans, LA.
  8. Newman, D.L., & Goodwin-Segal, T. (2003, November). Evaluation of a Technology Integration Challenge Grant Program: Using Technology to Connect Museums and Classrooms. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
  9. Newman, D.L., Risch, M., & King, J. (2004, April). Views from the opposite side of the camera: Content providers’ perceptions of videoconferencing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  10. Newman, D.L., Nolan, A., Quinlan, B. (2004, April). Views from opposite sides of the camera: Teachers’ perceptions of videoconferencing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  11. Newman, D.L., King, J.A., Gligora, M.A., Guckemus, S.M., & Pruden, J.M. (2004, November). Evaluating the impact of videoconferencing: Documenting teacher outcomes and changes in instructional strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, GA.
  12. Newman, D.L. (2005, March). Beyond the barriers: Benefits of K-12 teacher participation in collaborative classroom videoconferencing training. Presentation at the annual meeting of SITE conference, Phoenix, Arizona.
  13. Newman, D.L., Gligora, M.A., King, J., & Guckemus, S. (2005, April). Breaking down the classroom walls: The impact of external videoconferencing on children’s cognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, CN.
  14. Newman, D.L., Barbanell, P., & Falco, J. (2005). Achievement of student cognitive growth: Results of integrating interactive museum videoconferencing. In J. Trant & D. Bearman (Eds.). Museums and the Web 2005. Toronto: Archives& Museum Informatics, published March 31, 2005 at http://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/newman/newman.html
  15. Peat, M. (2000). The role of information technology in biology education: An Australian perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 69-73.
  16. Peat, M. (2000). The role of information technology in biology education: An Australian perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 69-73.
  17. Valenti, C. (2003). Preparing teachers for the high tech classroom.” in Gordon, David T., Ed. The Digital Classroom: How Technology is Changing the Way We Teach and Learn. Harvard Education Letter. Cambridge, MA. 2003.
  18. Wilson, K. (2000). Virtual seminars in European studies: A model for collaborative learning. Computer and the Humanities, 34, 345-347.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.