You are here:

Practicing and prospective teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about using technology in their educational practice: Part 1
PROCEEDING

, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands ; , Monash University, Australia ; , , University of Padova, Italy ; , , , Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands ; , , William & Mary School of Education, United States ; , Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, Netherlands

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-37-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

In 1986, Shulman introduced the concept of pedagogical reasoning and action as an important means for teachers to continually professionalize and improve their teaching. This concept also helps us to understand why and how practicing and prospective teachers use technology in their teaching. In this symposium, we aim to deepen our understanding of prospective, novice and experienced teachers’ reasoning about their uses of technology. In addition, we will explore how pre-service and practicing teachers can be supported in improving the quality of their reasoning about the use of technology in their teaching.

Citation

Voogt, J., Phillips, M., Trevisan, O., de Rossi, M., Smits, A., La Roi, H., Bruijn, R., Harris, J., Hofer, M. & Fisser, P. (2019). Practicing and prospective teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about using technology in their educational practice: Part 1. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 13-16). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 7, 2023 from .

© 2019 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
  2. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers& Education, 59(2), 423-435.
  3. Harris, J. & Phillips, M. (2018). If there’s TPACK, is there technological pedagogical reasoning and action? In E. Langran& J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2051–2061). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of
  4. Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their use of technology. Computers& Education, 101, 70-83. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2016.05.009
  5. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
  6. Loughran, J. (2012). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. New York: Routledge.
  7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Doi:10.1111/J.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  8. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  9. Smart, V., Sim, C., & Finger, G. (2015, March). Are teachers lost in thought with technology? Moving from pedagogical reasoning to technological pedagogical reasoning. In D. Rutledge& D. Slykhuis (Eds.), SITE 2019-Las Vegas, NV, United States, March 18-22, 2019 Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3418-3425). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150476/
  10. Starkey, L. (2011). Evaluating learning in the 21st century: a digital age learning matrix. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 19–39. Https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.554021
  11. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communication technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 235–286.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections