You are here:

Failing to succeed: The value of failure in creativity
PROCEEDING

, , Monash University, Australia ; , Arizona State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-37-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Creativity is often aligned, in the academic literature and in policy, with desired 21st century skills. Creativity is also positioned as a vital part of education for digital futures and for the technology-driven learning settings and work lives that students will inevitably face. However, often missing in the writing and the rhetorics about creativity is the link between creativity and failure. We contend that an affirmative view of failure within education, and the designing of learning environments that recognise productive failure, is vital. The affirmation of failure as a pedagogical principle is an integral part of not only fostering creativity in students but also preparing them for the sorts of adaptations and flexibility they need in an environment of technological change. Research and policy development about the affordances of failure in facilitating creativity within education are much neglected, especially in an educational climate of caution and standardisation. In this conceptual and position paper we critically examine and affirm the place of productive failure as a pedagogical principle for promoting creativity. This pedagogical principle can be supported by four operational strategies: 1. Purposeful learning environments, 2. Assertive agency about mistakes, 3. Possibility thinking, and 4. Reflexivity following failure. We also offer possibilities of what a failure-textured and technological-oriented classroom might look like, including its design features.

Citation

Creely, E., Henderson, M. & Henriksen, D. (2019). Failing to succeed: The value of failure in creativity. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1403-1411). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 21, 2021 from .

© 2019 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Acton, A. (2017). The Most Creative Companies Are the Ones That Celebrate Failure. Here's How To Do It Effectively. Inc., June 13. Retrieved from https://www.inc.com/annabel-acton/stop-talking-about-celebratingfailure-and-start-doing-it-with-these-4-ideas.html
  2. Al Nuaimi, A. (2016). How digitisation is transforming education. The National, October 10. Retrieved from https://www.thenational.ae/opinion/how-digitisation-is-transforming-education-1.162204
  3. Arminio, J., & Schrum, K. (2013). Using Productive Failure to Increase Learning. Innovations in Teaching& Learning Conference Proceedings, 5, Compact Sessions II. Doi:
  4. Atjonen, P., Korkeakoski, E. & Mehtäläinen, J. (2011). Key pedagogical principles and their major obstacles as perceived by comprehensive school teachers, Teachers and Teaching, 17(3), 273-288.
  5. Bhatt, G. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75.
  6. Boekaerts, M. & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-Regulated Learning: Finding a Balance between Learning Goals and Ego-Protective Goals. In M. Boekaerts et al.(edits), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 417-450). SanDiego:
  7. Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 436-451.
  8. Casminaty, T., & Henderson, M. (2016). Risky business: ICT and creativity. In S. Prestridge& P. Albion (Eds.), Australian Council for Computers in Education 2016 Conference Refereed Proceedings. Brisbane, Australia, (pp. 16-22).
  9. Chan, J. & Schunn, C. (2015). The importance of iteration in creative conceptual combination. Cognition, 145, 104115.
  10. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  11. Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogies of possibility thinking. International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 108–119.
  12. Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52.
  13. Emmanuel, A. (2016). Reflexive Learning. In S. Danver (edit), The Sage Encyclopedia of Online Education (pp. 948-950). Thousand Oaks, Cal: Sage.
  14. Estabrooks, L.B., & Couch, S.R. (2018). Failure as an active agent in the development of creative and inventive mindsets. Thinking Skills and Creativity. DOI:
  15. Fourie, I. & Meyer, A. (2015). What to make of makerspaces: Tools and DIY only or is there an interconnected information resources space? Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 519-525.
  16. Gabelica, C., Van den Bossche, P., De Maeyer, S., Segers, M & Gijselaers, W. (2014). The effect of team feedback and guided reflexivity on team performance change. Learning and Instruction, 34, 86-96.
  17. Harris, A. & De Bruin, L. (2018). Creativity in Education. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved from http://education.oxfordre.com/view/
  18. Hall, T. (2012). Digital Renaissance: The Creative Potential of Narrative Technology in Education. Creative Education, 3(1), 96-100.
  19. Hansson, S. (2011). Risk. In E. Zalta, (Edit), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/risk/
  20. Hunter, J. (2015). Technology Integration and High Possibility Classrooms: Building from TPACK. New York: Routledge.
  21. Hartlaub, V. & Schneider, T. (2012). Educational Choice and Risk Aversion: How Important Is Structural vs. Individual Risk Aversion? SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research. DIW Berlin. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.887.8405 & Rep=rep1 & Type=pdf
  22. Harris, J.A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 913-929.
  23. Hastrup, K. (2007). Performing the world: Agency, anticipation and creativity. In E. Hallam & T. Ingold (eds.), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. London: Berg.
  24. Hay, C. (2016). Knowledge, Creativity and Failure. A New Pedagogical Framework for Creative Arts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Ceretkova, S., Černochová, M., Sendova, E., Sointu, E., & Tienken, C.H. (2018). Creativity and Technology in Education: An International Perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-16.
  26. Hochanadel, A. & Finamore, D. (2015). Fixed and Growth Mindset in Education and How Grit Helps Students Persist In the Face Of Adversity. Journal of International Education Research, 11(1), 47-50.
  27. Kapur, M. & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for Productive Failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1),45-83.
  28. Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289-299.
  29. Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62.
  30. Kaufman, J. & Sternberg, R. (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Kirk, C. & Pitches, J. (2013) Digital reflection: using digital technologies to enhance and embed creative processes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(2), 213-230.
  32. Kusano, S., Wright, M., & Conger, A. (2016). Development and assessment of self-agency, and the ability to innovate and take risks. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Occasional Paper, 34.
  33. Lewis, S. (2014). The Rise: Creativity, the Gift of Failure, and the Search for Mastery. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  34. Madrid, H.P., & Patterson, M.G. (2016). Creativity at work as a joint function between openness to experience, need for cognition and organizational fairness. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 409-416.
  35. Martin, A., Nejad, H., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. (2012). Adaptability: Conceptual and empirical perspectives on responses to change, novelty and uncertainty. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22, 58-81.
  36. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232.
  37. Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54-72.
  38. Nusbaum, E.C., & Silvia, P.J. (2011). Are openness and intellect distinct aspects of openness to experience? A test of the O/I model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 571-574.
  39. Page, T., & Thorsteinsson, G. (2017). The Impact of Conventional School Education on Students Creativity. IManager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 13(1), 12.
  40. Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53-66.
  41. Povova, M (2014). Creativity, the gift of failure, and the crucial difference between success and mastery. Brain Pickings. Retrieved from https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/03/10/sarah-lewis-the-rise-failure/
  42. Ready, K. (2016). Understanding Failure: The Key Insight That Empowers Entrepreneurs to Do Their Best Work. Forbes, June 25. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinready/2016/06/25/understanding-failurethe-key-insight-that-empowers-entrepreneurs-to-do-their-best-work/#1025c7c2e8c7
  43. Reeve, E. (2015). STEM thinking! Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(4), 8-16.
  44. Rich, J. (1991). Overcoming educational failure. Journal of Thought, 26(3/4), 4-17.
  45. Rhyammar, L. & Brolin, C. (1999). Creativity research, historical considerations and main lines of development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(3): 259–27.
  46. Sarasvathy, S. (2009). Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  47. Siegler, R. (1996). Emerging minds: the process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
  48. Silvia, P.J., Nusbaum, E.C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087-1090.
  49. Smith, S., & Henriksen, D. (2016). Fail again, fail better: Embracing failure as a paradigm for learning and the visual arts. Art Education Journal, 69(2), 6-11.
  50. Swanson, H., & Collins, A. (2018). How failure is productive in the creative process: Refining student explanations through theory-building discussion. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
  51. Tække, J. & Paulsen, M. (2017). Digitalisation of education— the theory of the three waves. Aarhus, Denmark: The Centre for Internet Research.
  52. Tahirsylaj, A.S. (2012). Stimulating creativity and innovation through Intelligent Fast Failure. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 265-270.
  53. Taylor, S (2013). Failure: what's it good for in arts and higher education? The Guardian (Australia). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/culture-professionals-blog/2013/oct/21/failurein-arts-higher-education
  54. Wrahatnolo, T & Munoto (2018). 21st centuries skill implication on educational system. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 296 (2018) 012036. Retrieved from http://iopscience.iop.org/article/

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References