You are here:

Facilitating Access to Digital Records of Practice in Education with Technology
PROCEEDING

, University of Michigan School of Education, United States ; , University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States ; , , University of Michigan School of Information, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Many disciplines are changing their traditional approaches to data, encouraging data producers to share data and enable researchers and practitioners to reuse data to answer new research questions and address educational needs. In response, data repositories have emerged, and the availability of data has increased. Repositories build infrastructure to facilitate data access and provide software tools for reuse. This paper analyzes the reuse of digital records of practice (DROP) in education through the lens of one software tool, Zaption, focusing on DROP reuse by teachers, teacher educators, and individuals involved in professional development activities. Using analytics data from one repository’s Zaption integration from 2012-2016, we found that producers and reusers of DROP preferred an array of rich communication tools over tools that added technical functionalities. The results contribute both to our knowledge of DROP reusers as well as inform repositories about software choices to facilitate reuse.

Citation

Crawford, E., Suzuka, K., Frank, R. & Yakel, E. (2018). Facilitating Access to Digital Records of Practice in Education with Technology. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1-10). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 24, 2019 from .

© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Albertson, D., & Ju, B. (2015). User and Topical Factors in Perceived Self-Efficacy of Video Digital Libraries (pp. 143–146). ACM Press.
  2. Aubert, O., Prié, Y., & Canellas, C. (2014). Leveraging Video Annotations in Video-Based E-Learning. In eprint arXiv:1404.4607. Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from arXiv:1404.4607 [cs.CY] Bass, H., Usiskin, Z., Burrill, G., National Research Council (U.S.), Mathematical Sciences Education Board, & United States
  3. National Commission on Mathematics Instruction (Eds.). (2002). Studying Classroom Teaching as a Medium for Professional Development Proceedings of a U.S.-Japan Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10289.html
  4. Bates, M.S., Phalen, L., & Moran, C.G. (2016). If You Build It, Will They Reflect? Examining Teachers’ Use of an Online Video-Based Learning Website. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 17–27. Https://doi.org/10.1016/J.tate.2016.04.004
  5. Borgman, C., Darch, P., Sands, A., Pasquetto, I., Golshan, M., Wallis, J., & Traweek, S. (2015). Knowledge infrastructures in science: data, diversity, and digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 16(3/4), 207–227.
  6. Bossewitch, J.S., & Preston, M.D. (2011). Learning Through Digital Media: Experiments in Technology and Pedagogy. Columbia University.
  7. Brunvand, S. (2010). Best Practices for Producing Video Content for Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 247–256.
  8. Carter, D. (2015). Conceptions of Work and the Materiality of the Classroom. Presented at the iConference, Newport Beach, CA. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/73657
  9. Chin, G., & Lansing, C.S. (2004). Capturing and Supporting Contexts for Scientific Data Sharing via the Biological Sciences Collaboratory. In CSCW ’04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 409–418).
  10. Diamond, T., Price, S., & Chandrasekar, R. (2013). Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Analyzing Large-Scale Query Logs to Improve the Research Experience. The Code4Lib Journal, (21), 1–16.
  11. Frank, R.D., Suzuka, K., & Yakel, E. (2016). Examining the Reuse of Qualitative Research Data: Digital Video in Education. In Archiving Conference (Vol. 2016, pp. 146–151). Washington, DC: Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
  12. Measures of Effective Teaching Longitudinal Database. (2017, February 3). Retrieved February 3, 2017, from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/METLDB/step1/metx.html
  13. Pea, R.D., & Hoffert, E. (2007). Video Workflow in the Learning Sciences. In R. Goldman, R.D. Pea, B. Barron, & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 427–460). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Rice, R.E., & Borgman, C.L. (1983). The Use of Computer-Monitored Data in Information Science and Communication Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(4), 247–256. Https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340404
  15. Simon, D.A., Gordon, A.S., Steiger, L., & Gilmore, R.O. (2015). Databrary: Enabling Sharing and Reuse of Research Video. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 279–280). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
  16. Teaching Channel. (2017). Teaching Channel Homepage. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from https://www.teachingchannel.org/
  17. Uglean Jackson, L., & McKinley, M. (2016). It’s How Many Terabytes?! A Case Study on Managing Large Born Digital Audiovisual Acquisitions. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(2).
  18. University of Michigan School of Education. (2014). Teaching & Learning Exploratory [Repository]. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from https://tle.soe.umich.edu/
  19. Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., & Sechrest, L. (2000). Unobtrusive Measures. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  20. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M.J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding Affordances and Challenges of Three Types of Video for Teacher Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454–462.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections