You are here:

What do Medical Students Learn from Evaluating Flipped-Classroom-based Curriculum: A Grounded Theory Study
PROCEEDING

, , University of Virginia School of Medicine, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

This grounded theory study is investigating how medical students learn from direct involvement in evaluating a technology-facilitated learner-centered undergraduate medical education curriculum. Specifically, we focused our investigation on learners’ experience evaluating the pre-clerkship curriculum, which has been constructed based on the flipped classroom model. Initial analysis of 24 individual student interviews revealed themes illustrating the impact evaluation activities had on their educational endeavors. These activities prompted students to: practice reflection; hone skills to communicate differing opinions and provide effective feedback; acquire deeper understanding of the curriculum; and appreciate the significance of evaluation as a process empowering students to participate in their own learning. Whereas traditional evaluation theories emphasize the importance of evaluation as a way to inform program practice and improvement, the current study expands this notion by revealing a direct educational impact achieved through learners’ participation in evaluation activities. Most importantly, learners’ curriculum evaluation experiences were consistent with their other flipped learning experiences, emphasizing a learner-centered approach. Findings from this study could inform other practitioners implementing flipped classroom model to consider evaluation practices that support their learner-centered vision.

Citation

Chen, W. & Bradley, E. (2018). What do Medical Students Learn from Evaluating Flipped-Classroom-based Curriculum: A Grounded Theory Study. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 455-460). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14.
  2. Bishop, J.L. & Verleger, M.A. (2013) The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, June 23-26.
  3. Burgess, A., McGregor, D. & Mellis, C. (2014) Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: A systematic review. Academic Medicine. 89(4), 678–688.
  4. Chen, K.-S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y.-H., Jenq, C.-C., Chang, Y.-J., Chang, Y.-C., & Chai, P.Y.-C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: A meta-analysis. Medical Education.
  5. Chen, W., Worden, M., & Bradley, E. (2015). Flipping, Engaging, and Teaming, Oh My! Lessons learned from a large scale curriculum reform at a US medical school. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp.15-16).
  6. Galway, L.P., Corbett, K.K., Takaro, T.K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 181.
  7. Hurney, C., Harris, N., Bates Prins, S., & Kruck, S.E. (2014). The impact of a learner-centered, mid-semester course evaluation on students. The Journal of Faculty Development, 28(3), 55–62.
  8. Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick (2015). An introduction to the New World Kirkpatrick® Model. Retrieved from http://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com
  9. Kite, M.E., Subedi, P.C., & Bryant-Lees, K.B. (2015). Students’ perceptions of the teaching evaluation process. Teaching of Psychology, 42(4), 307–314.
  10. Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.
  11. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.
  12. Pettit, J.E., Axelson, R.D., Ferguson, K.J., & Rosenbaum, M.E. (2015). Assessing effective teaching: What
  13. Rashid, T., & Asghar, H.M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic medical students value when developing evaluation instruments. Academic Medicine, 90(1), 94–99.
  14. Sandars, J. (2009). The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Medical Teacher, 31(8), 685– 695.
  15. Song, L., & Hill, J.R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42
  16. Tan, C., Yue, W.-G., & Fu, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 4(4), 192–200.
  17. Tsingos, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., & Smith, L. (2014). Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(1).
  18. White, C., Bradley, E., Martindale, J., Roy, P., Patel, K., Yoon, M., & Worden, M.K. (2014). Why are medical students ‘checking out’ of active learning in a new curriculum? Medical Education, 48(3), 315–324.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.