You are here:

Social innovations within makerspace settings for early entrepreneurial education - The DOIT project
PROCEEDING

, Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH (Salzburg, Austria), Austria ; , Centre for Social Innovations (Vienna, Austria), Austria ; , YouthProAktiv, Belgium

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Amsterdam, Netherlands Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

The H2020 project DOIT and its 13 partners contribute to youth employment and to the creation of new jobs in the social economy by nurturing in young pupils’ entrepreneurial mind-sets, knowhow and skills. The project empowers primary and secondary school pupils (6-16 years) alongside educators to apply open innovation methods, digital maker tools and collaboration skills to tackle societal problems. In this paper, the authors introduce to the background and approach of the project and the design of its learning activities called “DOIT actions”.

Citation

Schön, S., Voigt, C. & Jagrikova, R. (2018). Social innovations within makerspace settings for early entrepreneurial education - The DOIT project. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1716-1725). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 30, 2020 from .

© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.
  2. Anderson T., Andrew Curtis A. & Wittig C. (2014). Definition and Theory in Social Innovation. Report Master of Arts in Social Innovation. Danube University.
  3. Bria F. (2015). Growing a digital social innovation ecosystem for Europe. DSI Final Report. European Commission (ed), http:/dx.doi.org/
  4. Dali, Birita (2015). The making of future entrepreneurs. The relationship between Fablabs and entrepreneurial intentions of students in upper secondary school, Thesis at the Haskoli Islands
  5. Digital Social Innovation Homepage (2014). Http://digitalsocial.eu/ (2016-03-12)
  6. European Commission (2016). European 2020 strategy, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-anutshell/index_en.htm
  7. European Commission’s Thematic Working Group on Entrepreneurship Education (2014). Thematic Working Group on Entrepreneurship Education. Final Report. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc & Id=17016 & No=1 (201612-04)
  8. Eurostat (2015). Sustainable development in the European Union. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6975281/KS-GT-15-001-EN-N.pdf(2016-12-04)
  9. Hochgerner, Josef (2009). Innovation processes in the dynamics of social change.In: Jiri Loudin / Klaus Schuch (ed.), Innovation Cultures. Challenge and Learning Strategy. Prague: Filosofia; pp. 17-45
  10. Haynes, Gail (2013). The Lemonade Stand Millionaire: A Parents' Guide to Encouraging the Entrepreneurial Spirit in Your Kids. Morgan James Pub. Hochgerner, Josef. 2012. “New Combinations of Social Practices in the Knowledge Society.” In Challenge Social Innovation, 87–104. Springer.
  11. Honey, M. & Kanter, D.E. (2013). Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators. New York: Routledge. Hubert, A. Et al. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union, BEPA (Bureau of European Policy Advisers) (Ed.), Brussels, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation.pdf (2017-12-12)
  12. Kraemer, Romy (2016). Critical Competences for Social Impact Leader. In: Standford Social Innovation Review. Published at Nov. 23, 2016, URL: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/critical_competences_for_social_impact_leaders (2017-12-03)
  13. Kulikowich, Jonna M., & Young, Micheal. (2001). Locating an Ecological Psychology Methodology for Situated Action. In: Journal of the Learning Sciences 10:165.
  14. Lackéus, M., Lundqvist, M. & Williams Middleton, K. (2013). How can Entrepreneurship Bridge Between Traditional and Progressive Education? ECSB Entrepreneurship Education Conference. Aarhus, Denmark, 29-31 May 2013.
  15. Lackéus, Martin (2015). Entrepreneurship in education. What, Why, When, How. OECD/EC. URL: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/BGP_Entrepreneurship-in-Education.pdf (2017-12-03)
  16. Lenz, B. (2015). Failure Is Essential to Learning. In: Edutopia, April 8, 2015, URL: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/failure-essential-learning-bob-lenz (2016-12-03)
  17. Mulgan, G. (2006). Social Innovation: what is it, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneur
  18. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. And Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. London:. The Young Foundation/ NESTA. URL: https://youngfoundation.org/publications/the-open-book-of-social-innovation/ (2017-12-12)
  19. OECD (2012). Gender Equality in Education, Employment and Entrepreneurship. Final Report to the MCM. URL: https://www.oecd.org/employment/50423364.pdf (2016-12-03)
  20. Papert, S. & Harel I. (1991) Preface, Situating Constructionism, in Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism, Research reports and essays, 1985-1990 (P. 1), Norwood NJ.
  21. Pinchot, G. (1984). Who is the Intrapreneur? In: Intrapreneuring: Why You Don't Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur. New York: Harper& Row. Pp. 28-48.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections