You are here:

An Open Learning Analytics Systems Ensuring Students’ Privacy
PROCEEDING

, ETH Zurich, Switzerland ; , ETH Zürich, Switzerland

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Amsterdam, Netherlands Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

With the rise of learning analytics the collection, storage and analyses of educational data became important. Often the data is generated and collected in different learning management systems the students interact with and the combination of the collected data is challenging. Another challenge is to ensure the privacy of the collected data. This paper describes the requirements for an open learning analytics system which allows easy extension with different data providers and ensures the the privacy of the collected data.

Citation

Sichau, D. & Fässler, L. (2018). An Open Learning Analytics Systems Ensuring Students’ Privacy. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 116-121). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Chatti, M.A., Muslim, A., & Schroeder, U. (2017). Toward an Open Learning Analytics Ecosystem. In Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education (pp. 195–219).
  2. Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin, Mar, 3–7. Https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0Drachsler,H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and Analytics– it ’ s a DELICATE Issue A Checklist for Trusted Learning Analytics. 6th Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 10. Https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883893
  3. Duit, R. (1995). The constructivist view: A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice. Constructivism in Education.
  4. Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. LAK ’11 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 9–17. Https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090118Johnson,J.A.(2014).TheEthics Of Big Data In Higher Education. IRIE International Review of Information Ethics, 4(April 2013), 3–10.
  5. Kovanović, V., Dawson, S., & Baker, R.S. (2015). Does Time-on-task Estimation Matter? Implications for the Validity of Learning Analytics Findings. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2, 81–110.
  6. Mazza, R., & Dimitrova, V. (2004). Visualising student tracking data to support instructors in web-based distance education. Proceedings of the 13th International WorldWide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers& Posters ’04, 154.
  7. Merceron, A., Blikstein, P., & Siemens, G. (2015). Learning analytics: From big data to meaningful data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(3), 4–8. , A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450. Https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152
  8. Rubel, A., & Jones, K.M.L. (2016). Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective. Information Society, 32(2), 143–159. Https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1130502Sichau, D., & Fässler, L. (2016). Evaluation of online learning materials with automatically collected interaction data. In Proc. Of the 28th World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (EdMedia 2016) (pp. 1429–1436).
  9. Sichau, D., & Fässler, L. (2017). The Challenges and Benefits of Regular Face-to-Face Interactions at Large-Scale Blended Learning. Proc. Of the 29th World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (EdMedia 2017), 1276–1285.
  10. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46, 30–32. Acknowledgments This work is based on research supported by Innovedum fund of ETH Zurich. We would like to thank all our

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.