
K-12 Online Learning: Trends From Two Decades of Scholarship
PROCEEDING
Karen T. Arnesen, Joshua Hveem, Cecil R. Short, Richard West, Brigham Young University, United States ; Michael Barbour, Touro University California, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
In this study, we examined the research literature in the field of K-12 online learning to identify the leading scholars, journals, top-cited articles, research methods, and topics in this field of inquiry. Our research process involved first, collecting a corpus of journal articles focused on K-12 online and distance learning; second, categorizing these articles according to their research methodologies; third, analyzing trends not only in methodologies employed, but also in authorship, citations, journals, and topics addressed. In analyzing 356 articles, we found the field of K-12 online learning to be growing rapidly in recent years with acceleration not only of new articles, but especially of new authors. We also found that the field of K-12 online learning began primarily emphasizing theoretical articles, but is now maturing and emphasizing increasingly more data-based articles. We found K-12 online learning scholarship is scattered among many journals, providing rich opportunities for scholars while also making it more difficult to discern trends across the discipline. This makes literature review and meta-analysis papers particularly important in this domain, and these should continue to be encouraged.
Citation
Arnesen, K.T., Hveem, J., Short, C.R., West, R. & Barbour, M. (2018). K-12 Online Learning: Trends From Two Decades of Scholarship. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 658-666). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 18, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182962/.
© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Barbour, M.K. (2007). Who’s researching virtual schools: A case for instructional technologists. Distance Learning, 4(1), 7-12.
- Barbour, M.K. (2011). The promise and the reality: Exploring virtual schooling in rural jurisdictions. Education in Rural Australia, 21(1), 1-20.
- Berge, Z.L., & Clark, T. (2005). Virtual schools: Planning for success. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M.K., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/607 Curtis, H. & Werth, L. (2015). Fostering student success and engagement in a K-12 online school. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(2), 163-190.
- Hasler Waters, L., Barbour, M.K., & Menchaca, M.P. (2014). The nature of online charter schools: Evolution and emerging concerns. Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 17(4), 379-389.
- Kennedy, K. & Archambault, L. (2015). Bridging the gap between research and practice in online learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 5-7.
- Leydesdorff, L. (1986). The development of frames of references. Scientometrics, 9(3-4), 103-125.
- Lowes, S. (2014). A brief look at the methodologies used in the research on online teaching and learning. In R. Ferdig& K. Kennedy (Eds)., Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning (pp. 83-104).
- Vogel, R., & Güttel, W.H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446.
- Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
- West, R.E. (2011). About this article and new series. Educational Technology, 51(4), 60.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References