You are here:

Effects of Learning with e-TPCK on Pre-service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

, University of Cyprus, Cyprus

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


The author herein discusses the design of e-TPCK, a self-paced adaptive electronic learning environment that was integrated in a second-year educational technology course to engage pre-service teachers’ in rich learning experiences in order to develop their TPCK in a personalized way. The system deploys a technological solution that promotes teachers' ongoing TPCK development by engaging them in rich and valuable personalized learning experiences through the use of technology-infused design scenarios, while taking at the same time into account teachers’ diverse needs, information processing constraints, and preferences. Results from an experimental research design study revealed statistically significant differences between the control group and the experimental group in favor of the experimental group, signifying that students in the experimental group who learned with e-TPCK outperformed the students in the control group in terms of developing TPCK competencies.


Christodoulou, A. (2018). Effects of Learning with e-TPCK on Pre-service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2012-2018). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Agyei, D.D. & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547-564.
  2. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277–320.
  3. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
  4. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Computers& Education, 52, 154-168.
  5. Angeli, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2010). PAUL: An adaptive electronic learning environment to scaffold teacher expertise and ICT-related technological pedagogical content knowledge. In A. Tzavanari & N. Tsapatsoulis (Eds.), Affective, interactive and cognitive methods for eLearning design: Creating an optimal education experience (pp. 173-186). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  6. Angeli C., Valanides N., Mavroudi A., Christodoulou A., & Georgiou K. (2015) Introducing e-TPCK: An Adaptive E-Learning Technology for the Development of Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In: Angeli C., Valanides N. (Eds.) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp.305-317). Boston, MA: Springer.
  7. Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 Computational Thinking Curriculum Framework-Implications for Teacher Knowledge. Educational Technology& Society, 19(3), 47–57.
  8. Azevedo, R., Greene, J.A., & Moos, D.C. (2007). The effect of a human agent’s external regulation upon college students’ hypermedia learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2/3), 67–87.
  9. Chien, Y., Chang, C., Yeh, T., & Chang, K. (2012). Engaging pre-service science teachers to act as active designers of technology integration: a MAGDAIRE framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 578-588.
  10. Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 557–573.
  11. Eifler, K., Greene, T., & Carroll, J. (2001). Walking the talk is tough: From a single technology course to infusion. The Educational Forum, 65(4), 366–375.
  12. Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Khezri, Z., & Azevedo, R. (2011). An investigation of accuracy of metacognitive judgments during learning with an intelligent multi-agent hypermedia environment. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T.F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 96–101). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  13. Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers& Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.
  14. Harris, J. (2016). Inservice teachers' TPACK development: Trends, models, and trajectories. In M. Herring, M. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (2nd ed., pp. 191-205). New York, NY: Routledge.
  15. Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for preservice science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.
  16. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrat-ing content, pedagogy and technology. Computers& Education, 49(3), 740-762.
  17. Lim, C.P., & Chai, C.S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computermediated classroom lesson. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.
  18. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  19. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  20. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P.W. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
  21. Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  22. Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition& Learning, 4, 33-45.
  23. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  24. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  25. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Primary school curricula and the use of ICT in education. Two worlds apart? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 962–975.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact