You are here:

Preparing high school students for transition to college-level math curriculum: Solutions for effectively integrating technology

, Florida State University, United States ; , The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, United States ; , Valdosta State University, United States ; , Educational Consultant, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Student experiences with the large, college-level courses included difficulty with sustaining the pace and volume of material (self-managing their learning to learn as quickly as the instructional and assessment schedule required), securing resources to support their learning within and outside the class session (seeking follow-up explanations and more examples, obtaining process-oriented feedback to support new learning), maintaining attendance and/or attention, and adjusting to the impersonal nature of the instruction in general Therefore, our presentation will focus on strategies and technologies to address these issues that secondary and post-secondary educators can share with their students and pre-service teachers


Tackett, S., Torres, K., Arrastia-Chisholm, M. & Earnshaw, Y. (2018). Preparing high school students for transition to college-level math curriculum: Solutions for effectively integrating technology. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1851-1857). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 19, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
  2. Anderson, J.R. & Gluck, K. (2001). What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems? In D. Klahr & S.M. Carver (Eds.), Cognition& Instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 227-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Ashcraft, M. & Krause, J. (2017). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin& Review, 14(2), 243-248.
  4. Bennett, C. (2015). Creating cultures of participation to promote mathematical discourse. Middle School Journal, 46(1), 20-25. Broll, L., E Gross, A., & Piliavin, I. (1974). Effects of offered and requested help on help seeking and reactions to being helped. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4(3), 244-258. Http://,M.(2012).Theimportance of self-regulation for college student learning. College Student Journal, 46(4), 892-902.
  5. Earnshaw, Y. (2014). Effects of levels of instructional assistance on learning and mental effort in an intelligent tutoring system: Proportional reasoning and middle school students. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3637974)
  6. Epper, R.M., & Baker, E.D. (2009). Technology solutions for developmental math: An overview of current and emerging practices. Journal of Developmental Education, 26(2), 4-23.
  7. Ford, S., & Inan, F. (2013, March). Students’ perceived feelings of connectedness in online community college mathematics courses. In Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 424-427). Association for the
  8. Schertzer, M.J., Robinson, R., Landschoot, T., Ghosh, A., Liberson, A., & Hensel, E. (2014, November). Effect of office hour participation on student performance. In ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (pp. V005T05A027-V005T05A027). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Retrieved from SRI International. (2013). Evidence shows how the right use of technology can increase math learning. Retrieved from
  9. Suh, J.M. (2010). Tech-knowledgy for diverse learners [Technology Focus Issue]. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(8), 440–447.
  10. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329. Http://,B.J.(2000).Attainingself-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact