You are here:

Transforming Teacher Preparation: Assessing Digital Learners’ Needs for Instruction in Dual Learning Environments
PROCEEDING

, Franciscan University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

As traditional classrooms have expanded to include virtual learning environments, teachers’ acquisition of specific knowledge and skills for effective use of technology has become paramount This research examines pre-service teachers’ needs relevant to integrating technology in an online learning environment and is a first step toward acknowledging the responsibility teacher preparation programs have in the formation of educators equipped to instruct in dual learning environments, providing opportunities to become fluent in the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) vital for online and traditional face-to-face instruction The purpose of this study was to determine if active engagement with content of an online instruction module would affect the attitudes, knowledge and skills, and instructional centeredness of pre-service teachers’ towards technology integration in an online learning environment A mixed-methods concurrent triangulation design procedure was conducted to evaluate the effect of engagement with the content of the online instruction module for all three domains
Participants made statistically significant gains upon completion of the intervention The implementation of an intervention such as this online module supports teacher preparation programs in identifying strengths and weaknesses of their pre-service teachers, providing valuable information necessary to guide program goals and preparing for instruction in dual learning environments.

Citation

Poyo, S. (2018). Transforming Teacher Preparation: Assessing Digital Learners’ Needs for Instruction in Dual Learning Environments. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1682-1689). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 13, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  2. Archambault, L. (2011). The practitioner’s perspective on teacher education: Preparing for the K-12 online classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(1), 73-91.
  3. Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., Shelton, C., Dalal, M., McAllister, L., & Huyett, S. (2016). Incremental Progress: Re-examining field experiences in K-12 online learning contexts in the United States. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 303-326.
  4. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Validating the technology proficiency self-assessment questionnaire for 21st century learners (TPSA C-21), Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20-31.
  5. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.
  6. Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude, structure and function. In D.T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fisk, and G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 269–322). New York, NY: McGowan-Hill.
  7. Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
  8. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. Doi:10.1016/S10967516(00)00016-6
  9. Gemin, B., Pape, L., Vashaw, L., & Watson, J. (2015). Keeping pace with K-12 digital learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Mountain View, CA: Evergreen Education Group.
  10. Gunter G.A., & Gunter, R.E. (2014). Teachers discovering computers, integrating technology in a changing world, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  11. Kennedy, K., & Archamnbault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 63(3), 185-200.
  12. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK)? In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp.3-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
  13. Kovalik, C., Kuo, C., & Karpinski, A. (2013). Assessing pre-service teachers’ information and communication technologies knowledge. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(2), 179-202.
  14. Lee, J.K. (2008). Toward Democracy: Social Studies and TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Inovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 129-144). New York, NY: Routledge.
  15. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. National Education Association (NEA). (N.D.). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “four Cs”. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
  16. O’Connor, E. (2010). The effect on learning, communication, and assessment when student-created youtubes of microteaching were used in an online teacher-education course. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(2), 135-154.
  17. O’Neil, G. & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G.O’Neil, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (pp. 27-36). Dublin, Ireland: AISHE.
  18. Petri, S., Poyo, S., McVey, K., Smith, M.L. & Pratt, K. (2015). Research Panel on Professional Development and Teacher Preparation for K-12 Online and Blended Settings. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1369-1371). Chesapeake, VA:
  19. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
  20. Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2009). The status of professional development for K-12 online teachers: Insights and implications. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 523-545.
  21. Venkatesh, V. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decisions Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
  22. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Retrieved from http://www.uwec.edu/CETL/resources/upload/LearnerCenteredTeachingFiveKeyChangestoPractice.pdf Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.) San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.